• MUHAMMAD SHAKIRIN SHAARI School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • AZMAN TAA School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • SALINA ISMAIL School of Multimedia Technology & Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • AHMAD SUKI CHE MOHAMED ARIF School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.



self-directed learning model, Tadabbur, reading comprehension, Nazm al-Quran, coherent structure


The focus of the SALaM (Self-directed al-Quran Learning Model) is to provide a conducive platform for al-Quran readers to perform tadabbur or self-study of al-Quran involving mainly reading comprehension process of al-Quran. The development of the model is divided into two main stages involving the development of a coherent structure of al-Quran contents as a whole. The second stage is the development of the model itself. The first stage is developed based on the formalization of the Nazm al-Quran principle proposed by Farahi and Islahi. The model itself is based on the implementation of reading comprehension strategies based on two main reading comprehension theories namely the Construction-Integration theory of Kintsch and Constructionist model of Graesser. A learner evaluation on the application of the model was done to assess the perception of learners using the SALaM. This stage was implemented by utilizing a Likert scale-based questionnaire to 39 learners who follows several sessions of the al-Quran walkthrough sessions which implemented the SALaM model. The study further focuses on the learning aspect of al-Quran rather than the tafsir methodology of al-Quran, therefore we described it as the ulum ta’alim al-Quran (Science of learning al-Quran) aspect, not the traditional ‘ulum al-Quran (science of exegesis of al-Quran). The assessment of SALaM model application yielded a favorable acceptance of al-Quran learners. Most 39 respondents (about 96.9%) found that the use of the main theme (‘amud) is very helpful in the comprehension of al-Quran. In conclusion, the model has provided significant help in the reading comprehension process of al-Quran and is very potential to provide the platform or basis for self-learning al-Quran in general.


Abdullah, M. (2012): Trends of Nazm-Al-Qurān in Tafsīr Literature in the Sub-Continent. – Al-Az̤vā 27(37): 55-70.

Abidin, N.Z., Saad, M.F.M., Ahmad, M.N. (2017): Tahap Pengetahuan Pelajar di Madrasah Al-Musthafawiyah Littahfizil Quran Bangi Terhadap Tadabbur Al-Quran. – AL-TURATH JOURNAL OF AL-QURAN AND AL-SUNNAH 2(1): 47-53.

Alawi, A.H.I. (2018): The Uslub of Tafsir Al-Quran. – Journal of Islamicate Studies 1(1): 1-10.

Allen, L.K., Jacovina, M.E., McNamara, D.S. (2016): Cohesive Features of Deep Text Comprehension Processes. – Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society in Philadelphia, Austin, Texas: Cognitive Science Society 6p.

Alshenqeeti, H. (2019): On Coherence in Quranic Discourse: A Linguistic Analysis. – Social Science Research Network 38p.

Baharun, H., Rahman, S.A., Ahmad, H., Saad, N.S.M., Jamal, I.H. (2020): Quranic understanding among non-native speaker of Arabic: Malaysian experts’ perspectives. – GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 20(2): 203-221.

Dymock, S., Nicholson, T. (2010): “High 5!” Strategies to enhance comprehension of expository text. – The Reading Teacher 64(3): 166-178.

El-Awa, S.M.S. (2002): Textual relations in the Qur'an. – University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (United Kingdom) 196p.

Embong, A.H., Hanapi, M.S. (2017): The Application Methods of the Holy Quran’s Interpretations in Islamic-Related Research. – Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 7(2): 521-535.

Fadhil, A. (2004): An Analysis of Historical Development of Tafsir Mawdui. – Jurnal Usuluddin 20: 89-104.

Farahi, H.A.D. (2008): Exordium to Coherence in the Qur'an (an English translation of Muqadimah Nizam al-Qur'an),(trans. Tariq Mahmood Hashmi). – Lahore: Al-Mawrid 112p.

Gheitury, A., Golfam, A. (2008): The Qur’an as a Non-Linear Text: Rethinking Coherence. – The International Journal of Humanities 15(1): 119-133.

Graesser, A.C. (2007): An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. – Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies 26p.

Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., Trabasso, T. (1994): Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. – Psychological Review 101(3): 371-395.

Hashim, A., Tamuri, A.H. (2012): Persepsi pelajar terhadap kaedah pembelajaran tahfiz al-Quran di Malaysia. – Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education 4(2): 1-10.

Islahi, A.A. (2007): Tadabbur-e-Qur’an: Pondering Over the Qur’an. – Islamic Book Trust 693p.

Khan, I.A. (2008): Amin Ahsan Islahi: An Introduction to His Tafs¥ r Methodology. – American Journal of Islam and Society 25(4): 21-45.

Khan, I.A. (2003): Al-Biqā ‘ī and Iṣlāḥī: A Comparative Study of Tafsīr Methodology. – Intellectual Discourse 11(2): 183-207.

McNamara, D.S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., O’Reilly, T. (2007): The 4-pronged comprehension strategy framework. – Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies 31p.

McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., Kintsch, W. (1996): Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. – Cognition and Instruction 14(1): 1-43.

Mir, M. (2013): Continuity, Context, and Coherence in the Qur’ān: A Brief Review of the Idea of Naẓm in Tafsīr Literature. – Al-Bayan: Journal of Qur'an and Hadith Studies 11(2): 15-29.

Mir, M. (1986): Coherence in the Qur'an: A Study of Islahi's Concept of Nazm in Tadabur-I Qur'an. – Ilhambooks 136p.

Nadeem, N. (2015): A Call for a Collaborative Approach to Understanding Textual Coherence in Quran. – QURANICA-International Journal of Quranic Research 7(1): 55-74.

Read Naturally Official Portal (2022): Comprehension. – Read Naturally Official Portal. Retrieved from:

Saad, M.F.M., Mohamad, S., Hamdi Ishak, H. (2021): Implementation of Tadabbur Element in Quran Memorisation Process. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 11(7): 1189-1198.

Wharton, C., Kintsch, W. (1991): An overview of construction-integration model: a theory of comprehension as a foundation for a new cognitive architecture. – ACM Sigart Bulletin 2(4): 169-173.

Yahaya, M., binti Zakaria, R., Pangilun, S., binti Husin, H. (2019): Tadabbur al-Quran: Anlisa Terhdap Persepsi Pelajar Di Maahad Tahfiz Selangor. – 5th International Seminar on Islamiyyat Studies 12p.




How to Cite

SHAARI, M. S., TAA, A., ISMAIL, S., & ARIF, A. S. C. M. (2023). AL-QURAN LEARNING MODEL FOR SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(5), 59–85.