HUBUNGAN KEPIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL DENGAN PRESTASI KERJA GURU DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH HARIAN BIASA, SARAWAK
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND TEACHER JOB PERFORMANCE IN REGULAR SECONDARY SCHOOLS, SARAWAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i4.399Keywords:
prestasi kerja guru, kepimpinan transformasional, sekolah menengah, gaya kepimpimpinanAbstract
Kajian ini dilakukan bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan kepimpinan transformasional pengetua dengan prestasi kerja guru dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah harian biasa bantuan penuh kerajaan di negeri Sarawak, Malaysia. Kajian bukan eksperimental ini mengaplikasikan kaedah tinjauan dengan menggabungkan beberapa teknik persampelan kebarangkalian bagi mendapatkan sampel. Data dikumpul menggunakan satu set borang soal selidik adaptasi yang ditadbir ke atas 363 orang guru. Data dianalisis menggunakan perisian IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0. Statistik deskriptif dan inferensi seperti peratus, min, sisihan piawai, Ujian-t, dan korelasi Pearson digunakan untuk menganalisis data bagi menjawab soalan kajian. Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan kepimpinan transformasional pengetua dan prestasi kerja guru diamalkan pada tahap yang tinggi. Hasil kajian juga mendapati terdapat perbezaan skor min yang signifikan kepimpinan transformasional pengetua dan prestasi kerja guru berdasarkan jantina. Ujian korelasi Pearson pula menunjukkan terdapat hubungan linear positif yang sederhana bagi kepimpinan transformasional pengetua dengan prestasi kerja guru. Implikasi dan cadangan kajian lanjut turut dibincangkan.
References
Abba, H.D., Anumaka, I.B., Gaite, S.S. (2016): Leadership practices and productivity of academic staff in polytechnics in Nigeria. – American Journal of Academic Research 1(2): 56-67.
Abdullah, M.Y., Abd Rashid, S., Mohamed, Z. (2008): Kekuatan Hubungan Motif, Sikap Dan Latihan Perguruan Dengan Profesionalisme Keguruan Pelajar Tahun Akhir Program Pendidikan IPTA. – Malaysian Education Deans' Council Journal, USM 16p.
Ahmad, J., Boon, Y. (2011): Amalan kepimpinan sekolah berprestasi tinggi (SBT) di Malaysia. – Journal of Edupres 1: 323-335.
Ahmad, Z.A., Osman, I., Amri, A.Y. (2002): Employee satisfaction and empowerment: Review of literature. – Universiti Sains Malaysia 79p.
Anderson, M. (2017): Transformational leadership in education: A review of existing literature. – International Social Science Review 93(1): 1-13.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A. (1996): Introduction to research in education Orlando. – FL: Holt, Reinhart and Winston 688p.
Babbie, E. (2001): The practice of social research. – Wadsworth Thomson Learning 498p.
Baharin, B., Adnan, M.H., Mohd Zin, M.H., Kamaludin, M.N., Mansor, A.N. (2016): Gaya kepimpinan guru besar dan tahap efikasi guru. – Journal of Personalized Learning 9p.
Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J. (2000): MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Redwood City: Mind Garden. – Leaders Form, Rater Form and Scoring Key for MLQ from 5x-Short 6p.
Bass, B.M., Bass Bernard, M. (1985): Leadership and performance beyond expectations. – Free Press 256p.
Bass, B.M., Stogdill, R.M. (1990): Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. – Simon and Schuster 1182p.
Beverborg, A.O.G., Sleegers, P.J., Van Veen, K. (2015): Fostering teacher learning in VET colleges: Do leadership and teamwork matter? – Teaching and Teacher Education 48: 22-33.
Burns, J.M. (1978): Leadership. – Harper & Row 530p.
Campbell, J.P. (1990): Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. – In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Consulting Psychologists Press 45p.
Carr, P.G., De La Garza, J.M., Vorster, M.C. (2002): Relationship between personality traits and performance for engineering and architectural professionals providing design services. – Journal of Management in Engineering 18(4): 158-166.
Carriere, J., Bourque, C. (2009): The effects of organizational communication on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in a land ambulance service and the mediating role of communication satisfaction. – Career Development International 14(1): 29-49.
Chua, Y.P. (2014): Asas statistik penyelidikan. – McGraw-Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 336p.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2002): Research methods in education. – Routledge 656p.
Colbert, A.E., Kristof-Brown, A.L., Bradley, B.H., Barrick, M.R. (2008): CEO transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. – Academy of Management Journal 51(1): 81-96.
Cutchin, G.C. (1998): Relationships between the big five personality factors and performance criteria for inservice high school teachers. – Purdue University 160p.
Daft, R.L. (2012): New Era of Management. – South-Western: Cengage Learning 700p.
Dannhauser, Z., Boshoff, A.B. (2007): The relationships between servant leadership, follower trust, team commitment and unit effectiveness. – University of Stellenbosch 477p.
Drury, S. (2004): Employee perceptions of servant leadership: Comparisons by level and with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. – Regent University 109p.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B.J., Shamir, B. (2002): Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. – Academy of Management Journal 45(4): 735-744.
Eliophotou Menon, M. (2014): The relationship between transformational leadership, perceived leader effectiveness and teachers’ job satisfaction. – Journal of Educational Administration 52(4): 509-528.
Gorji, M. (2011): The effect of job burnout dimension on employees’ performance. – International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 1(4): 243-246.
Hagemann, G. (2020): The motivational manual. – Gower Pub Co 200p.
Herzberg, F.I. (1966): Work and the Nature of Man. – World Publishing Company 203p.
Hicks, S.D. (2012): Self-efficacy and classroom management: A correlation study regarding the factors that influence classroom management. – Liberty University 127p.
Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., Gong, Y. (2010): Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non‐managerial subordinates. – Journal of Organizational Behavior 31(1): 122-143.
Ishak, N.M., Mustapha, R., Ariffin, S.R., Hassan, S.N.S. (2003): Kecerdasan emosi dan hubungannya dengan nilai kerja. – Jurnal Teknologi 39: 77-84.
Ishak, R., Ghani, M.F.A., Siraj, S. (2017): Amalan kepimpinan organisasi pembelajaran di sekolah berprestasi tinggi Malaysia. – JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 1(2): 1-12.
Ismail, A., Abdullah, D.N.M.A., Wahid, N., Shariff, M.N.M. (2010): Kesan amalan komunikasi dalam sistem ganjaran dan keadilan prosedur terhadap prestasi kerja. – International Journal of Management Studies 17(1): 203-223.
Jones, D., Rudd, R. (2008): Transactional, Transformational, or Laissez-Faire Leadership: An Assessment of College of Agriculture Academic Program Leaders'(Deans) Leadership Styles. – Journal of Agricultural Education 49(2): 88-97.
Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. (2004): Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. – Journal of Applied Psychology 89(5): 755-768.
Kahai, S.S., Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J. (2000): Effects of leadership style, anonymity and rewards in an electronic meeting system environment. – The Leadership Quarterly 14(4): 499-524.
Khasawneh, S., Omari, A., Abu-Tineh, A.M. (2012): The relationship between transformational leadership and organizational commitment: The case for vocational teachers in Jordan. – Educational Management Administration & Leadership 40(4): 494-508.
Kosnin, A.M., Tan, S.L. (2008): Pengaruh personaliti terhadap kepuasan kerja dan stres kerja guru. – Jurnal Teknologi 14p.
Krejcie, R.V., Morgan, D.W. (1970): Determining sample size for research activities. – Educational and Psychological Measurement 30(3): 607-610.
Leh, L.Y., Abdullah, A.G.K. (2017): Persekitaran maklum balas dan kepercayaan terhadap pemimpin sebagai penentu bimbingan kerja dalam organisasi pendidikan. – JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 2(3): 1-12.
Mahdinezhad, M., Yunus, J., Noor, M.A.M., Kotamjani, S.S. (2017): The Association of Leadership Styles and Administrators’ Performance. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7(6): 2222-6990.
Majid, K. (2000): Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. – Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka 599p.
Manning, M.L., Bucher, K.T. (2013): Classroom management: Models, applications, and cases. – Pearson 303p.
Mansor, R., Mohd Hamzah, M.I. (2015): Kepimpinan Berkualiti: Perspektif mengenai Kompetensi yang Diperlukan untuk Memimpin dengan Berkesan. – Jurnal Pengurusan 45: 19p.
Maslow, A. (1954): Motivation and personality. – New York: Harpers 394p.
Mohammad Mosadegh Rad, A. (2006): The impact of organizational culture on the successful implementation of total quality management. – The TQM magazine 18(6): 606-625.
Muda, T.E.A.T. (2021): Kecerdasan emosi, kepimpinan dan hubunganya dengan kepuasan kerja dalam kalangan ketua guru bimbingan dan kaunseling sekolah menengah. – e-Bangi 18(10): 76-93.
Mustaffa, C.S. (2004): Keberkesanan komunikasi organisasi: Satu analisis multidimensi. – International Journal of Management Studies 11(2): 91-122.
Neubert, M.J., Kacmar, K.M., Carlson, D.S., Chonko, L.B., Roberts, J.A. (2008): Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. – Journal of Applied Psychology 93(6): 1220-1233.
Orpen, C. (1997): The interactive effects of communication quality and job involvement on managerial job satisfaction and work motivation. – The Journal of Psychology 131(5): 519-522.
Price, A.M. (2008): The relationship between the teacher's perception of the principal's leadership style and personal motivation. – The University of Southern Mississippi 104p.
Saad, H.S.M., Mohamad, B., Ismail, S.H.S. (2013): Peranan Integriti Sebagai Mediator Antara Kepuasan Kerja Menurut Perspektif Islam dan Prestasi Kerja: Pendekatan Empirikal Menggunakan Model SEM/AMOS. – In International Conference On Research In Ethics Education 2013 (ICRIEEd 2013), Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey 16p.
Safdar, R., Waheed, A., Rafiq, K.H. (2010): Impact of job analysis on job performance: Analysis of a hypothesized model. – Journal of Diversity Management 5(2): 17-36.
Sains, S. (2009): Peranan iklim organisasi dan ciri personaliti terhadap prestasi kerja. – Universiti Utara Malaysia 210p.
Sala, F. (2003): Leadership in education: Effective UK college principals. – Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(2): 171-189.
Salie, A. (2008): Servant-minded leadership and work satisfaction in Islamic organizations: A correlational mixed study. – University of Phoenix 285p.
Sarmiento, R., Beale, J., Knowles, G. (2007): Determinants of performance amongst shop‐floor employees: A preliminary investigation. – Management Research News 30(12): 915-927.
Segun-Adeniran, C.D. (2015): Leadership styles and job productivity of university library staff: interrogating the Nexus. – Library Philosophy and Practice 11p.
Selvam, D. (2017): Pengaruh personaliti terhadap prestasi kerja di kalangan guru-guru sekolah menengah. – Universiti Utara Malaysia 140p.
Shen, W. (2011): The application of a person-oriented criterion-related configural approach to the relationship between personality traits and work behaviors. – University of Minnesota 253p.
Spencer, L.M., Spencer, P.S.M. (2008): Competence at Work models for superior performance. – John Wiley & Sons 384p.
Surai, L., Taat, M.S. (2024): Pengaruh kompetensi kecerdasan emosi terhadap prestasi kerja guru di sekolah menengah, Sarawak. – Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 11(2): 1-19.
Svoboda, S.N. (2008): A correlational study of servant leadership and elementary principal job satisfaction in Ohio public school districts. – Northcentral University 137p.
Taylor, T.Z., Psotka, J., Legree, P. (2015): Relationships among applications of tacit knowledge and transformational/transactional leader styles: An exploratory comparison of the MLQ and TKML. – Leadership & Organization Development Journal 36(2): 120-136.
Washington, R.R. (2007): Empirical relationships among servant, transformational, and transactional leadership: Similarities, differences, and correlations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. – Auburn University 112p.
Williams, S.N. (2005): Testing the relationships between personality, motivation, leadership and process to success of self-directed work teams. – The University of Nebraska-Lincoln 154p.
Yukl, G. (2008): How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. – The Leadership Quarterly 19(6): 708-722.
