FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPANIES’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES AND PRACTICES: A REVIEW

Authors

  • MOHAMAD AFIQ DANIAL MARLIZAN @ MUSTAFA Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.
  • ANURATHA RAJASEGARAM Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i1.1034

Keywords:

compensation, strategy, equity, incentives, governance

Abstract

Compensation strategies have become a central mechanism through which organizations compete for talent, signal organizational values, and align employee behaviour with strategic objectives. This paper critically examines the multifaceted factors shaping companies’ compensation strategies and practices, moving beyond narrow market-driven explanations to highlight the interaction between economic, organizational, and institutional forces. Drawing on key theoretical perspectives, including equity theory, human capital theory, market competitiveness, and strategic alignment; the analysis demonstrates that compensation is not merely a technical pay-setting exercise but a socially embedded and strategically consequential process. The paper argues that employee perceptions of fairness, transparency, and equity play a decisive role in shaping motivation, engagement, and retention, often mediating the effectiveness of compensation systems regardless of absolute pay levels. While external labour market pressures and benchmarking practices strongly influence pay structures, overreliance on market comparisons risks undermining internal equity and organizational cohesion. At the same time, strategic alignment between compensation and business objectives remains uneven, particularly in organizations facing rapid growth, globalization, or technological disruption. Incentive-based pay, though widely adopted, introduces significant risk considerations that may distort decision-making and weaken long-term organizational performance if poorly governed. Organizational culture, governance structures, communication practices, and regulatory environments further shape compensation outcomes, particularly in relation to pay transparency, ethical accountability, and inclusion. The paper highlights emerging challenges such as budget constraints, pay analytics, multinational complexity, and rising societal scrutiny over pay inequality. Overall, the study contends that sustainable compensation strategies require an integrated, evidence-informed approach that balances competitiveness with fairness, flexibility with governance, and performance incentives with employee well-being. Without such integration, compensation systems risk reinforcing inequality, eroding trust, and weakening organizational resilience in an increasingly volatile labour market.

References

[1] Anto, M.L. (2013): Compensation Management Practices of Selected Companies: Basis for Compensation Management Program. – European Journal of Business and Management 5(19): 204-208.

[2] Bloom, M.C., Milkovich, G.T. (1995): The relationship between risk, performance-based pay, and organizational performance. – Cornell University 34p.

[3] Bussin, M.H., Pregnolato, M., Schlechter, A.F. (2017): Total rewards that retain: A study of demographic preferences. – SA Journal of Human Resource Management 15(1): 1-10.

[4] Cable, D.M., Judge, T.A. (1993): Effects of compensation systems on job search decisions: An application of person-organization fit. – Cornell University 44p.

[5] Chen, H.M., Fu, P.C. (2008): A systematic framework for performance appraisal and compensation strategy. – Human Systems Management 27(2): 161-175.

[6] Gerhart, B., Milkovich, G.T., Murray, B. (1992): Pay, performance, and participation. – Research Frontiers in Industrial Relations 45p.

[7] Gerhart, B.A., Trevor, C.O., Graham, M.E. (1995): New directions in compensation research: Synergies, risk, and survival. – Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 68p.

[8] Kabalina, V.I., Mondrus, O.V. (2017): Factors of talent management in a company: A contextual approach. – Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University. Management [Vestnik Sankt-Peterbugskogo Universiteta. Seriya “Menedzhment”] 2: 80-110.

[9] Magee, R. (2015): The effect of company performance and executive remuneration on employee's perceptions of fairness in the South African financial services industry. – University of Cape Town 119p.

[10] Nordgren Selar, A., Gagné, M., Hellgren, J., Falkenberg, H., Sverke, M. (2023): Compensation profiles among private sector employees in Sweden: Differences in work-related and health-related outcomes. – Frontiers in Psychology 14: 17p.

[11] Petera, P., Wagner, J., Mensik, M. (2014): Empirical research into the implementation of rewards systems in companies located in the czech republic. – GSTF Business Review (GBR) 3(2): 25-31.

[12] Snelgar, R.J., Renard, M., Venter, D. (2013): An empirical study of the reward preferences of South African employees. – SA Journal of Human Resource Management 11(1): 1-14.

[13] Weber, C.L., Rynes, S.L. (1991): Effects of compensation strategy on job pay decision. – Academy of Management Journal 34(1): 86-109.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FACTORS INFLUENCING COMPANIES’ COMPENSATION STRATEGIES AND PRACTICES: A REVIEW. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i1.1034