STRUCTURAL COHERENCE AND FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A CRITICAL INTERPRETIVE SYNTHESIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.1057Keywords:
higher education finance, funding sustainability, critical interpretive synthesis, structural determinants, policy coherence, institutional autonomyAbstract
The pursuit of sustainable funding for higher education is fundamentally impeded. Research is divided between detailed fiscal evaluations and broad governance studies, lacking a cohesive theory that elucidates how systemic structures influence financial resilience or susceptibility. This study utilises a Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) to analyse the fragmented literature and provide a new theoretical framework that elucidates financing sustainability as a dynamic result of structural configurations. An iterative, purposeful study of 92 important sources (2000-2024) was conducted in accordance with known CIS methodology. The analysis transitioned from descriptive themes to explanatory theory through reciprocal translation, refutational synthesis, and lines-of-argument reasoning. The synthesis indicates that sustainability is regulated by three interconnected structural domains: (1) the Regulatory-Institutional (formal autonomy); (2) the Socio-Economic (resource diversification logics); and (3) the Temporal-Political (policy stability). The key discovery is that resilience arises from configurational coherence - a synergistic alignment among these domains. Conversely, vulnerability arises from structural dissonance, when misaligned domains establish path dependencies and detrimental incentives, ensnaring systems in persistent fiscal distress. This study presents the Structural Coherence for Sustainability (SCS) Framework. It reconceptualises sustainability from a financial status to a structural accomplishment, produced by intentionally coordinated policy-institutional ecosystems. The framework offers a diagnostic instrument for policymakers and establishes a novel agenda for configurational research in higher education finance.
References
[1] Barnett-Page, E., Thomas, J. (2009): Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. – BMC Medical Research Methodology 9(1): 11p.
[2] Capano, G., Regini, M., Turri, M. (2017): Changing governance in universities: Italian higher education in comparative perspective. – Springer 192p.
[3] Crouch, C. (2020): Post-democracy after the crises. – John Wiley & Sons 200p.
[4] De Boer, H., Jongbloed, B., Benneworth, P., Cremonini, L., Kolster, R., Kottmann, A., Lemmens-Krug, K., Vossensteyn, H. (2015): Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems. – Center for Higher Education Policy Studies 163p.
[5] Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., Riley, R. (2006): Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. – BMC Medical Research Methodology 6(1): 13p.
[6] Dougherty, K.J., Natow, R.S. (2015): The politics of performance funding for higher education: Origins, discontinuations, and transformations. – JHU Press 253p.
[7] Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin III, F.S., Seto, K.C. (2021): Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. – Ambio 50(4): 834-869.
[8] Greenwood, R., Hinings, C.R., Whetten, D. (2014): Rethinking institutions and organizations. – Journal of Management Studies 51(7): 1206-1220.
[9] Hüther, O., Krücken, G. (2018): Higher education in Germany--recent developments in an international perspective. – Cham: Springer International Publishing 257p.
[10] Jongbloed, B. (2020): Public funding of higher education, Europe. In The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. – Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 11p.
[11] Jongbloed, B., Vossensteyn, H. (2001): Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. – Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 23(2): 127-145.
[12] Maassen, P., Olsen, J.P. (Eds.) (2007): University dynamics and European integration. – Dordrecht: Springer 248p.
[13] Mahoney, J., Thelen, K. (Eds.) (2015): Advances in comparative-historical analysis. – Cambridge University Press 305p.
[14] Marginson, S. (2011): Higher education and public good. – Higher Education Quarterly 65(4): 411-433.
[15] Pinheiro, R., Young, M. (2017): The university as an adaptive resilient organization: A complex systems perspective. – Emerald Publishing 20p.
[16] Pruvot, E.B., Estermann, T., Popkhadze, N. (2023): University Autonomy in Europe IV: The Scorecard 2023. – European University Association 119p.
[17] Ragin, C.C. (2009): Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. – University of Chicago Press 240p.
[18] Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C. (2012): Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. – Cambridge University Press 350p.
[19] Slaughter, S. (1990): The higher learning and high technology: Dynamics of higher education policy formation. – State University of New York Press 293p.
[20] Teixeira, P.N., Rocha, V., Biscaia, R., Cardoso, M.F. (2004): Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? – Kluwer 20p.
[21] Toye, F., Seers, K., Allcock, N., Briggs, M., Carr, E., Barker, K. (2014): Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. – BMC Medical Research Methodology 14(1): 14p.
[22] Turri, M. (2016): The difficult transition of the Italian university system: Growth, underfunding and reforms. – Journal of Further and Higher Education 40(1): 83-106.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ABD RAHMAN AHMAD, HAIRUL RIZAD MD SAPRY, MOHAMUD MOHAMED HASSAN, UMI KARTINI RASHID
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
