ACTIVE CLASSROOMS AND AGEING TEACHERS IN ESL EDUCATION IN INDIA AND MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.1063Keywords:
kinesthetic learning, ageing teachers, qualitative research, experiential learning, classroom management, educational policyAbstract
This study explores the intersection between kinesthetic learning preferences and the professional challenges encountered by aging female educators in ESL classrooms in India and Malaysia. Drawing on both regional and international literature, it examines how physically active, movement-based pedagogies, widely recognized for enhancing student engagement, participation, and language retention may simultaneously impose significant physical and psychological demands on older teachers, particularly women over the age of forty. While kinesthetic strategies such as role-play, station-based activities, and interactive group tasks are pedagogically effective, they often require sustained physical mobility, vocal projection, and high classroom energy levels. Using a qualitative research design, the study employs focus groups, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations to capture the lived experiences of these educators. The findings reveal recurring concerns including joint and muscle pain, chronic fatigue, cognitive overload from multitasking, and emotional exhaustion linked to performance expectations. Many participants expressed pressure to conform to contemporary “active classroom” norms despite experiencing age-related physical constraints. These challenges not only affect teachers’ well-being but may also influence instructional delivery and classroom dynamics. The study therefore underscores the importance of developing age-responsive pedagogical frameworks and institutional support systems to ensure sustainable and inclusive ESL teaching environments.
References
[1] Barbe, W.B., Swassing, R.H., Milone, M.N. (1979): Teaching through modality strengths: Concepts and practices. – Zaner-Bloser 117p.
[2] Bazirizii, A.D. (2022): The status and impact of practical activity in biology at Kintampo Senior High School. – University of Education 95p.
[3] Dunn, R.S., Dunn, K.J. (1993): Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. – Pearson 496p.
[4] Fleming, N.D., Mills, C. (1992): Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. – To Improve the Academy 11(1): 137-155.
[5] Karunanithi, V., Vasanthan, R., Kumar, S.H., Barman, B., James, J. (2020): Analysis of metacognitive tasks for second language speech development: Theory and research implications. – Journal of Critical Reviews 7(3): 152-158.
[6] Leite, W.L., Svinicki, M., Shi, Y. (2010): Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. – Educational and Psychological Measurement 70(2): 323-339.
[7] Maya, J., Luesia, J.F., Pérez-Padilla, J. (2021): The relationship between learning styles and academic performance: Consistency among multiple assessment methods in psychology and education students. – Sustainability 13(6): 18p.
[8] Moallem, M. (2007): Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments: A comparative study. – Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40(2): 217-245.
[9] Othman, N., Amiruddin, M.H. (2010): Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 7: 652-660.
[10] Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., Bjork, R. (2008): Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. – Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9(3): 105-119.
[11] Peacock, M. (2001): Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(1): 1-20.
[12] Prithishkumar, I.J., Michael, S.A. (2014): Understanding your student: Using the VARK model. – Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 60(2): 183-186.
[13] Shams, L., Seitz, A.R. (2008): Benefits of multisensory learning. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(11): 411-417.
[14] Tulsi, P.K., Poonia, M.P., Priya, A. (2016): Learning styles of engineering students. – Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 30(2): 44-49.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SENG TONG CHONG, WEI LUN WONG, R VASANTHAN, HAIDA UMIERA HASHIM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.