ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIM IMPLEMENTATION IN ENHANCING CLIENT VALUE IN DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Authors

  • FARIDAH MUHAMAD HALIL Studies of Quantity Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • SITI NORAZNIZA AHMAD SEKAK Studies of Quantity Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • ARDINI IZZATI MAZLAN Studies of Quantity Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.1089

Keywords:

Building Information Modelling, clients value, quantitative method, project delivery

Abstract

The concept of Building Information Modelling (BIM) has revolutionised the construction industry in Malaysia, especially in the project delivery aspect of the sector, by promoting collaboration and delivering better results for clients. This paper examines the effects of BIM on client projects as perceived by consultants in the Klang Valley. It focuses on aligning BIM with client expectations, the challenges of standardising deliverables, and the strategic importance of BIM in project delivery. A quantitative design was used, with a structured questionnaire administered to 167 consultants. The data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS software, which included BIM adoption, project impacts, implementation barriers, policy influence, and future trends. The results indicate that BIM enhances communication, stakeholder interaction, and transparency of costs and design accuracy, which positively affect client satisfaction, but issues such as high costs, a lack of skills, and change resistance persist. The research paper concludes that BIM offers advantages for clients but requires support from government policies, standardisation, and capacity building to expand its use and enhance its long-term value in real estate development.

References

[1] Ali, M., Ismail, K.M., Hashim, K.S.H.Y., Suhaimi, S., Mustafa, M.H. (2018): Historic building information modelling (HBIM) for Malaysian construction industry. – Planning Malaysia 16(7): 332-343.

[2] Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., Volm, J.M. (2013): The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). – International Journal of Project Management 31(7): 971-980.

[3] Creswell, J.W. (2021): A concise introduction to mixed methods research. – SAGE Publications 168p.

[4] Di Giovanni, G., Rotilio, M., Giusti, L., Ehtsham, M. (2024): Exploiting building information modeling and machine learning for optimizing rooftop photovoltaic systems. – Energy and Buildings 313: 23p.

[5] Farouk, A.M., Zulhisham, A.Z., Lee, Y.S., Rajabi, M.S., Rahman, R.A. (2023): Factors, challenges and strategies of trust in BIM-Based construction projects: A case study in Malaysia. – Infrastructures 8(1): 21p.

[6] Howard, R., Björk, B.C. (2008): Building information modelling–Experts’ views on standardisation and industry deployment. – Advanced Engineering Informatics 22(2): 271-280.

[7] Mohammed, H.S., Hilal, M.A. (2024): Improving Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation throughout the construction industry. – Journal of Engineering 30(02): 85-104.

[8] Nawari, N.O., Kuenstle, M. (2015): Building information modeling: Framework for structural design. – CRC Press 284p.

[9] Numan, M. (2024): BIM and risk management: A review of strategies for identifying, analysing and mitigating project risks. – Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences 3(1): 20-26.

[10] Poljanšek, M. (2017): Building information modelling (BIM) standardization. – European Commission 27p.

[11] Steel, J., Drogemuller, R., Toth, B. (2012): Model interoperability in building information modelling. – Software & Systems Modeling 11(1): 99-109.

[12] Succar, B. (2010): Building information modelling maturity matrix. – In Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies, IGI Global Scientific Publishing 38p.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BIM IMPLEMENTATION IN ENHANCING CLIENT VALUE IN DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 370-377. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.1089