ADHERENCE, CHALLENGES AND REVITALIZATION: UNDERSTANDING THE DECLINE OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE RELIGIONS IN MALAYSIA

Authors

  • JENN YUAN LEE Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Perak, Malaysia.
  • YEE MUN CHIN Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Perak, Malaysia.
  • CHEN CHUN TOH Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Perak, Malaysia.
  • YEONG NAN PHUA Tun Tan Cheng Lock Institute of Social Studies, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Perak, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i2.1106

Keywords:

Traditional Chinese Religions (TCR), Malaysia, secularization, syncretism, youth religiosity, religious conversion

Abstract

This article examines the decline, challenges, and possible revitalization of Traditional Chinese Religions (TCR) among Malaysian Chinese communities. Historically, TCR has functioned as a syncretic religious and cultural system combining Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, ancestor worship, temple rituals, and folk practices. It once played a central role in sustaining communal identity, social solidarity, and cultural continuity among Chinese migrants and their descendants in Malaysia. However, recent demographic trends, survey findings, and qualitative evidence suggest that TCR is experiencing a gradual weakening of adherence, especially among younger and more educated generations. Based on national census data, a nationwide survey of approximately 200 respondents, focus group discussions with religious leaders, and interviews with converts, this study examines the structural, generational, linguistic, and institutional factors contributing to this decline. The findings show that while TCR remains publicly visible through festivals, temples, and ritual practices, many followers engage with it more as cultural heritage than as a source of religious conviction or daily moral guidance. Younger adherents often possess limited doctrinal knowledge, face difficulties understanding ritual language, and view TCR as insufficiently relevant to modern life. Meanwhile, religious leaders acknowledge challenges such as resource limitations, competition from Christianity and Islam, lack of professional clergy, and weak youth engagement, but they remain divided over modernization. The results and discussion are presented through textual analysis rather than tables or figures, as the article’s central concern is to interpret meanings, perceptions, and institutional responses rather than to display extensive numerical comparisons. The article argues that revitalization is possible only if TCR organizations move beyond ritual preservation and adopt educational reform, bilingual communication, youth-oriented activities, social services, and more professionalized leadership.

References

[1] Adler, J.A. (2005): Chinese religion: An overview. – Encyclopedia of Religion 2: 1580-1613.

[2] Ching-Hwang, Y. (1976): The Confucian Revival Movement in Singapore and Malaya, 1899–1911. – fJournal of Southeast Asian Studies 7(1): 33-57.

[3] Creswell, J.W., Clark, V.L.P. (2017): Designing and conducting mixed methods research. – Sage Publications 520p.

[4] Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) (2022): Penemuan Utama Banci Penduduk dan Perumahan Malaysia 2020. – Statistics Report, Putrajaya: Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) 214p.

[5] Hall, B. (2006): Social and cultural contexts in conversion to Christianity among Chinese American college students. – Sociology of Religion 67(2): 131-147.

[6] Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (2019): Ethnography: Principles in practice. – Routledge 288p.

[7] Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., Stick, S.L. (2006): Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. – Field Methods 18(1): 3-20.

[8] Kim, R.Y. (2011): Religion and ethnicity: Theoretical connections. – Religions 2(3): 312-329.

[9] Kuah-Pearce, K.E. (2009): State, society, and religious engineering: Towards a reformist Buddhism in Singapore. – Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 351p.

[10] Lee, J.Y., Toh, C.C. (2023): Chapter 5: Revtalizing Traditional Chinese Religions in Malaysia: Organizational Leaders' Perspectives. – In A Study of Traditional Chinese Religion in Malaysia: The Decline and the Path towards Revitalization 12p.

[11] Mahoney, A. (2010): Religion in families, 1999–2009: A relational spirituality framework. – Journal of Marriage and Family 72(4): 805-827.

[12] Mun, C.Y. (2024): A Study of Traditional Chinese Religions in Malaysia: The Decline and the Path Towards Revitalization. – Yayasan Belia Buddhist Malaysia 67p.

[13] Mun, C.Y., Fee, L.Y. (2014): Settling Down Spiritually: Chinese Malaysian's Worship of Datuk Gong. – Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 22(1): 379-391.

[14] Sun, H.S. (2020): What Religions Do the Chinese Profess? – Oriental Daily Web Portal 12p.

[15] Tan, C.B. (2000): The religions of the Chinese in Malaysia. – Brill Publisher 166p.

[16] Tan, C.B. (1983): Chinese religion in Malaysia: A general view. – Asian Folklore Studies 42: 217-252.

[17] Tan, O. (2020): Buddhist revitalization and Chinese religions in Malaysia. Amsterdam University Press 204p.

[18] Yang, F. (2018): Atlas of religion in China: Social and geographical contexts. – Brill 260p.

[19] Yang, F., Tamney, J.B. (2006): Exploring mass conversion to Christianity among the Chinese: An introduction. – Sociology of Religion 67(2): 125-129.

[20] Yee, L.T., Elias, N.B., Ghani, M.A. (2019a): The Religious Conversion Process as An Unusual Life Experience to the Malaysian Chinese Muslim Converts in The Context Of Adulthood Self-Differentiation Development. – International Journal of Education 4(32): 164-173.

[21] Yee, L.T., Elias, N., Ghani, M.A. (2019b): The religious conversion process of the Malaysian Chinese Muslim converts. – Journal of Islamic 4(23): 64-77.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ADHERENCE, CHALLENGES AND REVITALIZATION: UNDERSTANDING THE DECLINE OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE RELIGIONS IN MALAYSIA. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i2.1106