ENGLISH AND CHINESE IN THE LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF NANJING, CHINA

Authors

  • HAIDA UMIERA HASHIM Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NOORFARIDA FILZAH MOHD SOBRI PARIDALUDDIN Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NUR ASYRANI CHE ISMAIL Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NURFARAH SAIFUL AZAM Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.
  • HANNA INSYIRAH MOHD SUKRI Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i3.1210

Keywords:

linguistic landscape, bilingualism, globalization, Nanjing, English-Chinese signage

Abstract

This study examines the coexistence of English and Chinese languages in public signage across Nanjing, China, through the lens of linguistic landscape studies. As one of China's ancient capitals and a rapidly globalising metropolis, Nanjing provides a unique setting where historical heritage intersects with increasing internationalisation and multilingual communication. Public signs serve not only as practical tools for conveying information but also as visible markers of cultural identity, language policy, and socio-economic development. Adopting a qualitative research approach, this study analyses bilingual public signs collected from selected tourist attractions, transportation hubs, commercial districts, educational institutions, and public facilities throughout the city. The analysis focuses on three key dimensions: the visibility and prominence of English and Chinese, the communicative functions performed by bilingual signage, and the linguistic accuracy and appropriateness of English translations. The findings indicate that Chinese remains the dominant language across public spaces, while English is predominantly used as a supplementary language to facilitate communication with international visitors and expatriates. Beyond its informational role, English also performs symbolic functions by projecting modernity, global connectivity, and an internationally welcoming city image. Nevertheless, the analysis identifies several inconsistencies in English translations, including grammatical inaccuracies, lexical choices, and awkward phrasing, which may affect communication effectiveness and international perceptions. These findings suggest that bilingual signage reflects not only practical communication needs but also broader socio-cultural and economic aspirations associated with globalisation. Overall, the linguistic landscape of Nanjing illustrates China's evolving linguistic identity, balancing the preservation of its rich cultural heritage with the demands of international engagement. The study contributes to the growing body of research on linguistic landscapes by providing insights into bilingual public signage in contemporary urban China and highlighting the relationship between language, identity, and globalisation.

References

[1] Ayyub, S., Rohmah, Z. (2024): The linguistic landscape of Kotabaru Malang Train Station: language representation in public space. – Cogent Arts & Humanities 11(1): 14p.

[2] Benu, N.N. (2025): The linguistic landscape as a pedagogical tool: enhancing language learning through signages in public space. – In: Benu, N.N., Jonathans, P.M. (eds.): Innovations in Language Learning: Pedagogical Strategies and Linguistic Insights. Artha Wacana Press, Kupang 31p.

[3] Chand, S.P. (2025): Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. – Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation 6(1): 303-317.

[4] Duan, A., Fang, Z. (2026): Mapping urban multilingualism: a spatial signature approach through street-level language patterns of seven U.S. immigrant cities. – Cities 170: 12p.

[5] Fang, L., Shangeetha, R.K. (2026): One country, many languages: exploring the linguistic landscape of shop signage in Singapore’s Chinatown. – Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 36(2): 284-309.

[6] Han, Y., Shang, G. (2024): Displaying and commodifying English on shop name signs. – In: Han, Y., Shang, G.: The Linguistic Landscape in China: Commodification, Image Construction, Contestations and Negotiations. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore 23p.

[7] Han, Y., Wu, X. (2020): Language policy, linguistic landscape and residents’ perception in Guangzhou, China: dissents and conflicts. – Current Issues in Language Planning 21(3): 229-253.

[8] Landry, R., Bourhis, R.Y. (1997): Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: an empirical study. – Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(1): 23-49.

[9] Liu, G., Ma, C. (2024): English in a rural linguistic landscape of globalizing China: language commodification and indigenous resistance. – English Today 40(1): 62-69.

[10] Rojas, B.G. (2025): Code-switching as identity negotiation in multilingual communities. – Bulletin of Language and Literature Studies 2(1): 13-23.

[11] Wang, X., Gao, Y. (2025): The role of English in the linguistic landscape of Luang Prabang: perceptions from merchants and consumers. – English Today 41(2): 85-95.

[12] Wang, Y. (2024): Translation of signs and the formation of a transnational space: a multimodal study of street signs in the African inhabited areas of Guangzhou. – Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45(9): 3729-3743.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ENGLISH AND CHINESE IN THE LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF NANJING, CHINA. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(3), 833-842. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i3.1210