FOOD INSECURITY IN BEANS WITHOUT KOR KOR

Authors

  • TIRZAH ZUBEIDAH ZACHARIAH Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • MOHD BAKRI ABU BAKAR Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • SUZULAIKA MOHAMAD Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • FAZLINAH SAID Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i3.1251

Keywords:

postcolonial literature, short story, ecocriticism, cultural continuity, traditions

Abstract

Beans without Korkor? written by Ekow Manuar Smith, was the winner of the United Nations’ Economic Commission for Africa short story award in 2021. The story focuses on the Sister Mercy and her five most loyal customers who regularly patronise Mercy’s eatery. The shop serves a famous Ghanaian dish of beans with plantain, known locally as kor kor. When Sister Mercy realises that she has only one piece of plantain to serve to her customers, the adults all scramble to get the piece of plantain, only to face a moment of humility when the youngest customer, Baby Cynthia, decides that they should all share the plantain in the spirit of community togetherness. The third-person narration offers a glimpse of ordinary people in Ghana: the hardworking female business owner, the top government person, the local blue-collar worker, the Latin migrant worker, the Chinese immigrant and the voice of reason, Baby Cynthia, a young girl obsessed with social media. The story exposes readers to themes such as community spirit and cultural continuity through food and traditions, while at the same time emphasises the more serious theme of food insecurity. This paper aims to analyse the satirical elements in the text, such as exaggeration and irony. It also explores the story’s realistic portrayal of food insecurity and its impact on the ordinary Ghanaians. Lastly, the paper examines how these elements are skilfully woven into the story to create a powerful social commentary which goes beyond mere satire.

Author Biographies

  • MOHD BAKRI ABU BAKAR, Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.

    Mohd Bakri Abu Bakar is a lecturer in the Department of Language Studies, Faculty of
    Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor. His research interests are educational
    technology and students’ learning styles.

  • SUZULAIKA MOHAMAD, Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.

    Suzulaika Mohamed is a lecturer in the Department of Language Studies, Faculty of
    Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor. Her research interests are digital
    learning and cultural heritage.

  • FAZLINAH SAID, Department of Language Studies, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.

    Fazlinah Said is a senior lecturer in the Department of Language Studies,
    Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor. Her research interests are
    teacher training and  literature.

References

[1] Abrams, M.H. (1993): A glossary of literary terms. 6th ed. – Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX 434p.

[2] Amir, J. (2005): Politik dalam novel. – Penerbit Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 194p.

[3] Baldick, C. (2008): Oxford dictionary of literary terms. – Oxford University Press 384p.

[4] Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. – Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77-101.

[5] Burgers, C., Konijn, E.A., Steen, G.J. (2016): Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. – Communication Theory 26(4): 410-430.

[6] Busu, F. (2010): Persamaan dan perbezaan dalam perkembangan novel-novel Melayu dan Indonesia. – ALTACOM (M) SDN. BHD. 464p.

[7] Chrystall, A.B., Sayers, J.G. (2017): King Konsumer: Menippean satire, spectatorship, sacrifice and consumption. – Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 31(2): 266-276.

[8] Claridge, C. (2011): Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 316p.

[9] Declercq, D. (2018): A definition of satire and why a definition matters. – The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76(3): 319-330.

[10] De Graft-Johnson, J.C. (1990): The significance of some Akan titles. – Research Review 6(1): 24-35.

[11] Eagleton, T. (1996): Literary theory: An introduction. – Blackwell, Oxford 248p.

[12] Hall, A. (2003): Reading realism: Audiences’ evaluations of the reality of media texts. – Journal of Communication 53(4): 624-641.

[13] Harris, R.T. (1952): Plausibility in fiction. – The Journal of Philosophy 49(1): 5-10.

[14] Holman, C. H. (1978): A handbook to literature. – Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis 615p.

[15] Jockers, M.L. (2013): Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. – University of Illinois Press 208p.

[16] Kernan, A. (1973): Satire. – In: Wiener, P.P. (Ed.): Dictionary of The History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas, Scribner, New York 7p.

[17] Kleinheksel, A.J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., Wyatt, T.R. (2020): Demystifying content analysis. – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 84(1): 127-137.

[18] Ohrvik, A. (2024): What is close reading? An exploration of a methodology. – Rethinking History 28(2): 238-260.

[19] Sander, C. (1971): The scope of satire. – Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL 275p.

[20] Schipper, M. (1985): Toward a definition of realism in the African context. – New Literary History 16(3): 559-575.

[21] Shumway, D.R. (2017): What is realism? – Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies 9(1-2): 183-195.

[22] Valsesia, F., Diehl, K., Nunes, J.C. (2017): Based on a true story: Making people believe the unbelievable. – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 71: 105-110.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FOOD INSECURITY IN BEANS WITHOUT KOR KOR. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(3), 450-459. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i3.1251