TRIANGULATING ADAPTED CAMBRIDGE PRE-A1 STARTERS ASSESSMENT AND PRESCHOOL OBSERVATIONS: A MALAYSIAN CASE STUDY

Authors

  • AISYAH KHALEEDA ROSLI Centre for Modern Languages, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA), Pahang, Malaysia.
  • WAN JUMANI FAUZI Centre for Modern Languages, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA), Pahang, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-3198
  • NOOR RAHA MOHD RADZUAN Centre for Modern Languages, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA), Pahang, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-6360

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i4.1275

Keywords:

CEFR Pre-A1, preschool English, Cambridge starters, classroom observation, triangulation, early childhood language learning

Abstract

As CEFR becomes part of early childhood education in Malaysia, understanding how preschool learners perform against Pre-A1 standards in real classroom settings are increasingly important. This case study looked at how 34 four-year-old and five-year-old children at a private preschool performed in an adapted Pre-A1 English assessment and compared it to classroom observations of language use in daily routines and play. They were tested on topics they had learned and the test covered listening, speaking, reading and writing. Results showed that listening was the strongest skill, with five-year-olds doing slightly better than four-year-olds. Speaking, reading and writing were more challenging and children often used Malay language or gestures when talking to peers. English was mainly used by teachers for everyday instructions and children rarely spoke English spontaneously. Writing was the hardest skill, reflecting limited vocabulary and early literacy development. Overall, the study highlights a gap between understanding and using English. While children can follow instructions, they often struggle to express themselves. The findings suggest the need for classroom activities that give children more opportunities to speak and write in English, with support suited to their age and abilities.

References

[1] Abdul Rahman, A., Saad, S., Nordin, R., Chuah, B.P., Shawalludin, S. (2025): CEFR as a guiding framework: Enhancing English proficiency among Malaysian kindergarten children. – International Journal of Modern Education 7(24): 1183-1196.

[2] Akdeniz, G., Gelmez Burakgazi, S. (2020): Erken yaşta yabancı dil öğrenimi ve öğretimine yönelik bir karma desen araştırması [Early foreign language learning and teaching]. – İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 21(1): 62-86.

[3] Aprilia, P.K., Romadhon, M.G.E., Fikri, D., Mustofa, M. (2023): Strategies and challenges in interdisciplinary English language teaching at the preschool level: A qualitative analysis. – Voices of English Language Education Society 7(3): 652-664.

[4] Atik, N.D., LaTourrette, A., Waxman, S.R. (2024): Preschoolers benefit from sentential context in familiar- and unfamiliar-accented speech. – Developmental Science 27(5): 10p.

[5] Bider Petelin, I., Ozbič, M. (2020): The structure of preliteracy competence in children aged five to seven years. – Hrvatska Revija za Rehabilitacijska Istraživanja 56(2): 18p.

[6] Bowen, G.A. (2009): Document analysis as a qualitative research method. – Qualitative Research Journal 9(2): 27-40.

[7] Braun, A., Maguire, M. (2020): Doing without believing – enacting policy in the English primary school. – Critical Studies in Education 61(4): 433-447.

[8] Bruner, J.S. (1983): Play, thought, and language. – Peabody Journal of Education 60(3): 60-69.

[9] Budianto, S., Sayidah, N., Sucipto, S., Mustofa, A. (2022): Teachers’ and students’ perception on acquiring English vocabulary for young learners using mobile apps in EFL context. – World Journal of English Language 12(8): 402-409.

[10] Council of Europe (2020): Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment-Companion Volume. – Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, France 280p.

[11] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L. (2007): Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. – SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 275p.

[12] Cunningham, A.J., Burgess, A.P., Witton, C., Talcott, J.B., Shapiro, L.R. (2021): Dynamic relationships between phonological memory and reading: A five year longitudinal study from age 4 to 9. – Developmental Science 24(1): 18p.

[13] De Ruiter, L.E., Lieven, E.V.M., Brandt, S., Theakston, A.L. (2020): Interactions between givenness and clause order in children’s processing of complex sentences. – Cognition 198: 22p.

[14] Deja, M., Zając-Lamparska, L., Trempała, J. (2025): Executive attention training effects in children aged 4 and 6 years: Improvement in the trained task greater for 6-year-olds, but far transfer greater for 4-year-olds. – Frontiers in Public Health 13: 11p.

[15] Ha, S., Hong, Y., Lee, R. (2024): Phonological memory in 5 to 6 year-old Korean children. – Communication Sciences & Disorders 29(2): 409-420.

[16] Hamim, Z.H., Abdul Razak, R., Abdul Hamid, B. (2021): The morphosyntactic abilities of bilingual Malay preschool children based on the Malay and English sentence repetition tasks. – Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 29(1): 71-90.

[17] Jamain, S., Jamaludin, K.A. (2023): Issues and challenges in the implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in Malaysian primary school. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 13(12): 5863-5877.

[18] Kay, L. (2024): ‘I feel like the Wicked Witch’: Identifying tensions between school readiness policy and teacher beliefs, knowledge and practice in early childhood education. – British Educational Research Journal 50(2): 632-652.

[19] Khu, M., Chambers, C.G., Graham, S.A. (2020): Preschoolers flexibly shift between speakers’ perspectives during real-time language comprehension. – Child Development 91(3): e619-e634.

[20] Kim, S.J., Oh, G.A., Seo, E.Y., Ko, Y.K. (2018): Performance in a phonological deletion awareness task according to age and gender: Development of a phonological awareness screening test for preschool children. – Phonetics and Speech Sciences 10(2): 61-68.

[21] Lucas, C. (2023): ‘Too young to learn English?’ Nurturing preschool children’s English learning. – Education Sciences 13(9): 28p.

[22] Mazlan, N.A., Tan, K.H., Othman, Z., Wahi, W. (2023): ClassPoint application for enhancing motivation in communication among ESL young learners. – World Journal of English Language 13(5): 520-526.

[23] Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOEM) (2015): English Language Education Reform in Malaysia: The Roadmap 2015-2025. – Ministry of Education Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia 456p.

[24] Mohamad, M.I., Mohamed, M.S., Abu Bakar, K. (2024): Preschool teachers’ issues and beliefs in English language teaching: A systematic review (2012-2022). – European Journal of Educational Research 13(1): 279-296.

[25] Papadopoulos, I., Bourogianni, M.E. (2024): Delving into word and print awareness in 4-year-old children. – British Journal of Education 12(3): 41-54.

[26] .Piaget, J. (1976): Piaget’s theory. – In: Inhelder, B., Chipman, H.H., Zwingmann, C. (Eds.), Piaget and His School: A Reader in Developmental Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 13p.

[27] Ramić, D., Hasanagić, A., Pehlić, A. (2024): Deskripcija fonološke svjesnosti kod djece predškolskog uzrasta [Description of phonological awareness in preschool children]. – Zbornik Radova Islamskog Pedagoškog Fakulteta 22(1): 240-254.

[28] Rohr, C.S., Arora, A., Cho, I.Y.K., Katlariwala, P., Dimond, D., Dewey, D., Bray, S. (2018): Functional network integration and attention skills in young children. – Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 30: 200-211.

[29] Scheffer, A., Keij, B., Hakvoort, B., Ottow-Henning, E., Gerrits, E., Wijnen, F. (2024): Speech sound development of young Dutch children with a developmental language disorder. – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 59(6): 2706-2722.

[30] Simanjuntak, M.B. (2024): Fostering child empowerment through English language competency in speaking skills. – Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 8(2): 255-264.

[31] Tomasello, M. (1992): The social bases of language acquisition. – Social Development 1(1): 67-87.

[32] Tse, S.K., Leung, C.Y., Tsui, P.F., Chan, K.Y., Kwok, M.C. (2021): A longitudinal investigation into the Chinese language development of non-Chinese speaking preschoolers in Hong Kong. – Journal of Language Teaching and Research 12(1): 183-193.

[33] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. – Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E. (Eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 159p.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TRIANGULATING ADAPTED CAMBRIDGE PRE-A1 STARTERS ASSESSMENT AND PRESCHOOL OBSERVATIONS: A MALAYSIAN CASE STUDY. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(4), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i4.1275