ISU DAN CABARAN PELAKSANAAN PENTAKSIRAN BILIK DARJAH MATA PELAJARAN BAHASA MELAYU MENGGUNAKAN KECERDASAN-BUATAN-GENERATIF (GEN-AI)
ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OF CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT IN THE MALAY LANGUAGE SUBJECT USING GENERATIVE-ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE (GEN-AI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i4.1325Keywords:
Gen-AI, Bahasa Melayu, kesahan instrumen, pendidikan digital, Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD)Abstract
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) telah merangka Pelan Strategik Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (PSKPM) 2024–2030 bagi memperkukuh sistem pendidikan negara selaras dengan perkembangan pendidikan digital semasa. Dalam konteks ini, pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) berasaskan Kecerdasan Buatan Generatif (Gen-AI) bagi mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu semakin mendapat perhatian, khususnya berkaitan isu kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan pentaksiran. Kajian ini bertujuan membincangkan isu dan cabaran pelaksanaan PBD menggunakan Gen-AI dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbentuk tinjauan literatur melalui analisis dokumen, artikel jurnal dan laporan berkaitan PBD serta pendidikan digital. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa pelaksanaan PBD berasaskan Gen-AI berhadapan dengan pelbagai cabaran melibatkan guru, murid, pentadbir sekolah, infrastruktur serta sokongan ibu bapa dan masyarakat. Selain itu, isu kompetensi digital guru, tekanan pentaksiran berterusan, jurang digital dan ketidaksediaan infrastruktur turut mempengaruhi keberkesanan pelaksanaan PBD. Implikasi kajian menekankan kepentingan latihan profesional guru, penambahbaikan infrastruktur digital, pemantauan pentaksiran serta penggunaan teknologi secara beretika bagi memastikan kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen pentaksiran dapat dipertingkatkan. Kajian ini juga mencadangkan agar lebih banyak penyelidikan dijalankan berkaitan pembangunan instrumen PBD berasaskan Gen-AI yang lebih sistematik, autentik dan sesuai dengan konteks pendidikan Bahasa Melayu.
The Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) introduced the Ministry of Education Malaysia Strategic Plan (PSKPM) 2024–2030 to strengthen digital education and assessment practices. In this context, the implementation of Classroom Assessment (PBD) using Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) in the Malay Language subject has raised concerns regarding the validity and reliability of assessment. This study aims to discuss the issues and challenges of implementing Gen-AI-based PBD in Malay Language education. A qualitative literature review approach was employed through the analysis of journal articles, reports, and related documents. The findings show that challenges involve teachers’ competency, students’ readiness, school management, infrastructure, and parental support. Issues such as digital competency, assessment pressure, and the digital divide also affect the effectiveness of PBD implementation. Therefore, continuous teacher training, infrastructure improvement, and ethical technology use are essential to ensure effective and reliable assessment practices. Future studies are recommended to focus on developing more systematic and authentic Gen-AI-based assessment instruments for Malay Language education.
References
[1] AlAfnan, M.A. (2024): Taxonomy of educational objectives: Teaching, learning, and assessing in the information and artificial intelligence era. – Journal of Curriculum and Teaching 13(4): 173-191.
[2] Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (2001): A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. – Longman 352p.
[3] Arumugham, K.S. (2020): Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. – Asian People Journal (APJ) 3(1): 152-161.
[4] Azzahra, K., Arbeni, W., Miranda, M., Putri, A.M., Putri, M.A. (2026): Three domains in Bloom’s taxonomy. – EDUCTUM: Journal Research 5(1): 21-24.
[5] Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956): Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. – Longmans, Green, New York 207p.
[6] Chuang, P.L., Yan, X. (2025): Language assessment in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. – System 134: 15p.
[7] Fatihah, S.N., Hisham, B.B.N., Sivalingam, L.A.P.O., Pailin, D.G., Hashim, F.N., Mustapha, M. (2024): Konflik dan penyelesaian dalam menjaga kualiti pendidikan pelajar selepas pemansuhan UPSR dan peningkatan tahap silibus. – Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesihatan Sosial 8(1): 109-118.
[8] Gopala Pilai, K., Kutty, F.M. (2022): Sikap guru Bahasa Melayu dalam pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. – Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) 7(5): 18p.
[9] Guo, S., Shi, L., Zhai, X. (2025): Developing and validating an instrument for teachers’ acceptance of artificial intelligence in education. – Education and Information Technologies 30(10): 13439-13461.
[10] Jekri, A., K Han, C.G., Shaafi, N.F. (2025): Cabaran dan potensi kecerdasan buatan generatif dalam pendidikan STEM: Suara guru sains di Sabah. – Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal 9(1): 316-325.
[11] Jette, J.G., Mohd Hamzah, M.I. (2020): Hubungan kemenjadian murid dalam proses pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PdPc) guru: Penilaian pentadbir sekolah. – Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan 2(1): 171-179.
[12] Kaldaras, L., Akaeze, H.O., Reckase, M.D. (2024): Developing valid assessments in the era of generative artificial intelligence. – Frontiers in Education 9: 10p.
[13] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (2026): Ringkasan eksekutif Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia 2026-2035. – Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 41p.
[14] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (2025): Panduan pengurusan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS). Edisi 1 Tahun 2025. – Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 95p.
[15] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (2024): Pelan Strategik Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 2024-2030. – Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 81p.
[16] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) (2019): Panduan pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Edisi ke-2. – Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 107p.
[17] Mahalingam, N.A.P., Jamaludin, K.A. (2021): Impak dan cabaran pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran atas talian semasa Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan. – Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan 3(4): 104-115.
[18] Mannogaran, V., Nor Shaid, N.A. (2023): Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen mengenai pengetahuan, sikap dan cabaran guru dalam pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. – Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) 8(1): 12p.
[19] Mohd. Sajari, F.F., Zulkifli, H., Surat, S. (2023): Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instruman kesediaan GPI melaksanakan Model Tasmik j-QAF secara dalam talian. – Journal of Quran Sunnah Education and Special Needs 7(1): 16-29.
[20] Mohd Rosszi, N.S.A., Jing, L.S., Yahya, N.A.H., Abdul Manaf, N.F. (2024): Tahap pengetahuan, kemahiran dan sikap guru Bahasa Melayu dalam melaksanakan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah di sekolah rendah. – Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu 14(1): 19-37.
[21] Mohd Sukis, S., Muhamad, N., Borham, A.H. (2022): Implementation of digital alternative assessment among Islamic Education teachers (IET) in primary schools. – International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling 7(47): 578-600.
[22] Mukherjee, S., Kittur, J. (2025): Learning through cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains: Understanding undergraduate engineering students’ perspectives in the United States. – Engineering Education Review 3(3): 11p.
[23] Mustaqim Roslan, M. (2024): Kaedah Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) dan kesannya kepada murid tahap satu: Analisis subjek Pendidikan Islam. – UMRAN – International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies 11(1): 63-78.
[24] Nik Saberi, N.S., Mohd Hamzah, M.I. (2020): Amalan kepimpinan lestari guru besar dan keberkesanan Sekolah Kebangsaan di Hulu Langat, Selangor. – Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan 7(3): 20-37.
[25] Nikolic, S., Suesse, T.F., Grundy, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Hassan, G.M., Daniel, S., Belkina, M., Lal, S. (2024): Laboratory learning objectives: Ranking objectives across the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains within engineering. – European Journal of Engineering Education 49(3): 454-473.
[26] Oc, Y., Gonsalves, C., Quamina, L.T. (2025): Generative AI in higher education assessments: Examining risk and tech-savviness on student’s adoption. – Journal of Marketing Education 47(2): 138-155.
[27] Owan, V.J., Abang, K.B., Idika, D.O., Etta, E.O., Bassey, B.A. (2023): Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. – Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19(8): 15p.
[28] Perkins, M., Roe, J., Furze, L. (2024): The AI Assessment Scale revisited: A framework for educational assessment. – ArXiv:2412.09029 20p.
[29] Potgieter, M.L., Filmalter, C., Maree, C. (2025): Teaching, learning and assessment of the affective domain of undergraduate students: A scoping review. – Nurse Education in Practice 86: 11p.
[30] Saleem, F., Chikhaoui, E., Malik, M.I. (2024): Technostress in students and quality of online learning: Role of instructor and university support. – Frontiers in Education 9: 12p.
[31] Shi, Y., Yu, K., Dong, Y., Chen, F. (2026): Large language models in education: A systematic review of empirical applications, benefits, and challenges. – Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 10: 16p.
[32] Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T.J., Chiu, T.K.F. (2024): A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21: 22p.
[33] Zacharis, G., Papadakis, S. (2025): Can AI grade like a human? Validity, reliability, and fairness in university coursework assessment. – Educational Process: International Journal 19: 22p.
[34] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., Gouverneur, F. (2019): Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16: 27p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SITI HARYANTI OSAMAN, MOHD EFFENDI @ EWAN MOHD MATORE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
