SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION: INTEGRATING TRADITIONAL CHINESE EMBROIDERY INTO ECO-FRIENDLY FASHION

Authors

  • YAQIAN ZHANG College of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • ROSE DAHALINA RUSLI College of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1443

Keywords:

Chinese embroidery, sustainable fashion, cultural sustainability, traditional craftsmanship, design innovation

Abstract

This study examines how traditional Chinese embroidery can contribute to sustainable fashion through cultural preservation, design innovation, and contemporary craft adaptation. Using a qualitative multiple-case approach, the research analyses three cases: Ruby Fang’s sustainable couture, Zhong Ming’s digitally mediated Shu embroidery, and Kartik Research’s artisan collaboration model. Data were drawn from literature, visual materials, publicly available case documentation, and secondary institutional sources, and interpreted through thematic analysis and cross-case triangulation. Findings identify three pathways for integrating traditional craftsmanship into contemporary fashion. First, motif translation preserves cultural narratives and enhances the symbolic and emotional value of garments. Second, digital technologies support pattern exploration, documentation, and heritage communication, while remaining dependent on artisans’ tacit knowledge and practical skills. Third, artisan collaboration strengthens cultural visibility and market differentiation, although its wider economic benefits remain unverified. Cultural sustainability emerges as the most clearly supported contribution across the cases. However, the available evidence does not establish reductions in environmental impact or measurable improvements in artisan livelihoods. Such claims require independent production records, lifecycle assessments, and socioeconomic data. The study offers a cautious framework for understanding embroidery as a culturally embedded design practice and highlights directions for future research into its environmental and social outcomes.

References

[1] Balchandani, A., Starzynska, E., Berg, A., D’Auria, G., Rölkens, F., Amed, I. (2023): The state of fashion 2024: Finding pockets of growth as uncertainty reigns. – McKinsey & Company and The Business of Fashion, United Kingdom 128p.

[2] Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. – Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77-101.

[3] Chapman, J. (2005): Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. – Routledge, London 211p.

[4] Clark, H. (2008): Slow + fashion—an oxymoron—or a promise for the future …? – Fashion Theory 12(4): 427-446.

[5] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D. (2017): Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. – SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks 304p.

[6] Dessein, J., Soini, K., Fairclough, G., Horlings, L. (eds.) (2015): Culture in, for and as sustainable development: Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 investigating cultural sustainability. – University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 73p.

[7] Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017): A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. – Ellen MacArthur Foundation, United Kingdom 150p.

[8] Fletcher, K. (2014): Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys. – Routledge, London 288p.

[9] Holroyd, A.T. (2017): Folk fashion: Understanding homemade clothes. – I.B. Tauris, London 256p.

[10] Joy, A., Sherry Jr, J.F., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J., Chan, R. (2012): Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. – Fashion Theory 16(3): 273-295.

[11] Luckman, S., Thomas, N. (eds.) (2023): Craft communities. – Bloomsbury Publishing, London 232p.

[12] Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., Gwilt, A. (2020): The environmental price of fast fashion. – Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1(4): 189-200.

[13] Polanyi, M. (1966): The logic of tacit inference. – Philosophy 41(155): 1-18.

[14] Rana, N.R. (2026): Designing with communities: A framework for undergraduate research in sustainable fashion. – Base Diseño e Innovación 10(12): 100-115.

[15] Rissanen, T., McQuillan, H. (2016): Zero waste fashion design. – Bloomsbury Academic, London 224p.

[16] Scaturro, S. (2008): Eco-tech fashion: Rationalizing technology in sustainable fashion. – Fashion Theory 12(4): 469-488.

[17] Su, J. (2021): A difficult integration of authenticity and intangible cultural heritage? The case of Yunnan, China. – China Perspectives 2021(3): 29-39.

[18] UNESCO (2003): Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris 20p.

[19] Walker, S. (2006): Sustainable by design: Explorations in theory and practice. – Routledge, London 256p.

[20] Yang, H., Sui, Q., Hu, B., Shi, K., Wang, R., Li, M. (2025): A semantic reconstruction and AI-controlled generation method for the cultural genes of Qing Dynasty embroidery patterns: A case study of official rank badges. – npj Heritage Science 13: 18p.

[21] Yin, R.K. (2009): Case study research: Design and methods. – SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks 219p.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION: INTEGRATING TRADITIONAL CHINESE EMBROIDERY INTO ECO-FRIENDLY FASHION. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(5), 722-733. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1443