ACADEMIC WRITING NEEDS TOWARD ETHNOANDRAGOGY-BASED SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si3.1458Keywords:
academic writing, digital learning, ethnoandragogy, needs analysis, self-directed learningAbstract
Academic writing competence is an essential skill for university students, enabling them to communicate ideas effectively and participate in scholarly discourse. However, many students still encounter difficulties in organizing ideas, constructing arguments, and applying appropriate academic conventions. Therefore, the development of effective learning materials that support students’ academic writing skills is an important concern in higher education. This study aims to analyze students’ needs regarding the development of academic writing learning materials based on ethnoandragogy and self-directed learning using an interactive flipbook. This research employed a mixed methods design. Quantitative data were collected through a survey involving 219 undergraduate students using a Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of 13 items. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The reliability analysis showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.939). The EFA results revealed a four-factor structure comprising: (1) academic writing and andragogy, (2) ethnopedagogy, (3) technology integration, and (4) reflective learning, explaining 72.4% of the total variance. Model fit indices indicated an acceptable to good fit (RMSEA = 0.0769; TLI = 0.950). The qualitative findings provide deeper insights into these results by revealing that students value the practicality and accessibility of digital learning materials, prefer self-directed and flexible learning environments, and expect culturally relevant content. However, they also experience challenges related to comprehension and unequal access to digital resources, as well as the need for more interactive learning features. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings suggests that students’ learning needs are multidimensional and context-dependent. Therefore, the development of academic writing materials should not only focus on instructional content but also incorporate learner autonomy, cultural relevance, and interactive digital design. The study suggests that developing ethnoandragogy-based academic writing materials delivered through interactive flipbooks may provide a promising approach to support students’ academic writing learning.
References
[1] Alshammary, F.M., Alhalafawy, W.S. (2023): Digital platforms and the improvement of learning outcomes: Evidence extracted from meta-analysis. – Sustainability 15(2): 21p.
[2] Asmayawati, Yufiarti, Yetti, E. (2024): Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. – Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 10(1): 15p.
[3] Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M. (2020): Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 36(4): 126-150.
[4] Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2021): One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis. – Qualitative Research in Psychology 18(3): 328-352.
[5] Brown, H.D., Lee, H. (2015): Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. – Pearson Education, White Plains 668p.
[6] Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2019): Digital literacy of teachers in training: Moving from ICTs to LKTs. – Education Sciences 9(4): 10p.
[7] Jamali, Y., Pratama, D., Anwar, S. (2022): Cultural representation in the practice of andragogy in the academic. – Lire Journal: Journal of Linguistics and Literature 6(2): 253-263.
[8] Keedle, H., Young, K., Arundell, F., Burns, E. (2024): Midwifery student engagement with digital interactive books: A cross sectional survey. – Women and Birth 37(6): 8p.
[9] Knowles, M.S., Holton III, E.F., Swanson, R.A., Robinson, P.A. (2020): The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. – Routledge, London 391p.
[10] Koohang, A., Riley, L., Smith, T., Schreurs, J. (2009): E-learning and constructivism: From theory to application. – Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning 5: 91-109.
[11] Oshima, A., Hogue, A. (2007): Introduction to academic writing. Level 3. – Pearson/Longman, White Plains 221p.
[12] Song, L., Hill, J.R. (2007): A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(1): 27-42.
[13] Suanda, I.W., Subrata, I.M., Rusmayanthi, K.I. (2024): Etnopedagogi sebagai media pelestarian kearifan lokal dalam pembelajaran biologi. – Emasains: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains 13(2): 87-95.
[14] Zhang, E.D., Yu, S. (2025): Conceptualizing digital multimodal composing competence in L2 classroom: A qualitative inquiry. – Computer Assisted Language Learning 38(1-2): 262-290.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INDRAWATI, NURHAYATI, MULYADI EKO PURNOMO, ERNALIDA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.