ENGLISH, BUT MAKE IT GEN Z: CREATIVITY AND VARIATION IN SOCIAL MEDIA LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si3.1466Keywords:
English language variation, generation Z, linguistic creativity, social media communicationAbstract
The popularity of social media has altered the communication pattern of young people, particularly the students of Generation Z who are living in the digital world where internet usage is their daily routine. Communication in these online platforms tends to space out of typical written English by incorporating emojis, abbreviations, innovative spelling, different typography, and seamless blending of English and local languages. Although these linguistic creativities are typical of the telecommunication platforms like WhatsApp and Instagram, their intended meanings can be misinterpreted or perceived as reckless or as lack of language proficiency. This issue reveals an opportunity for further research on the communicative values and social meanings of digital languages. This research aims to determine the creative linguistic elements applied by Generation Z learners on social media, and to analyse the new trends in digital English. Qualitative content analysis was employed to document language as it is naturally found in the digital context. Information is gathered in the form of the screen shots of the actual online communication as captured in several social media platforms like Instagram and WhatsApp communication. The results indicate the Generation Z students employ creative features of language like emojis, abbreviations, stylised spelling and code-mixing language in deliberate and organised means. These practices are signs of flexibility, awareness, and good communicative competence in the digital spaces than indicators of poor language abilities. It was revealed that the creative uses of English language by Generation Z on social media are both purposeful and socially inclined. Emojis, stylistic variation, code-mixing, and the use of abbreviation act as extensions of emotion, expression of identity, and relationship expression, and not to be perceived as language deficiency. This online language emerges as a new English language variation which can be perceived as a strategic strength in social communication among Generation Z.
References
[1] Adeoye, M.A. (2026): From hashtags to code-switching: A critical discourse analysis of language evolution on social media. – Journal of Communication Studies 6(1): 1-17.
[2] Adnan, N.A.A., Serip Mohamad, N.H. (2024): Perceptions of Malaysian Generations Y and Z on the use of Twitter language. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 14(11): 79-92.
[3] Azad, I., Chhibber, S., Tajhizi, A. (2023): How do different generations communicate on social media? A comparative analysis of language styles, emoji usage, and visual elements. – Language, Technology, and Social Media 1(2): 86-97.
[4] Babayiğit, M.V. (2025): The impact of technology on language communication. – In: Kasap, S. (ed.) Language in the Digital Age, Eğitim Yayınevi, Istanbul 14p.
[5] Bukhari, S.U.P., Imran, A., Hadi, S.A.A., Masood, I., Mirza, Z.A. (2025): Bridging the generational language gap: A study on the intergenerational comprehension of Gen Z’s language. – Journal of Asian Development Studies 14(3): 357-370.
[6] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D. (2018): Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th edition. – SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks 304p.
[7] Crystal, D. (2011): Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. – Routledge, London 192p.
[8] Danesi, M. (2017a): The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. – Bloomsbury Academic, London 197p.
[9] Danesi, M. (2017b): Visual rhetoric and semiotic. – Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, Oxford University Press 19p.
[10] Das, A., Gambäck, B. (2013): Code-mixing in social media text. – Traitement Automatique des Langues 54(3): 41-64.
[11] Ebner, C. (2017): “Sloppy speech is like sloppy dress”: Folk attitudes towards non-standard British English. – In: Bassiouney, R. (ed.) Identity and Dialect Performance: A Study of Communities and Dialects, Routledge, Abingdon: 125-140.
[12] Eisenlohr, P. (2004): Language revitalization and new technologies: Cultures of electronic mediation and the refiguring of communities. – Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 21-45.
[13] Elo, S., Kyngäs, H. (2008): The qualitative content analysis process. – Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1): 107-115.
[14] Gulnazir, N., Zainuddin, S.Z. (2025): Language innovation on social media: A case study of Rizz on TikTok. – GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 25(1): 119-136.
[15] Hashim, F., Soopar, A.A. (2022): Bahasa komunikasi atas talian dalam suasana akademik. – GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 22(4): 261-278.
[16] Hasjim, M., Arimi, S., Kushartanti, Arafah, B., Taqdir (2026): Language transformation in social media and its impact on the linguistic identity of Indonesian youth. – Journal of Language Teaching and Research 17(1): 296-305.
[17] Husaj, S. (2014): The role of “IT” in “ESP” learning. – Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5(22): 280-286.
[18] Mohammed, N.A., Johar, E.M., Mohamad, F., Abd Kadir, Z. (2025): Gen Y versus Gen Z: Generational differences in English slang types and perceived use of slang on social media. – International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 9(22): 230-243.
[19] Mohd Shamsuddin, A., Samson Juan, S., Chua, S., Bramantoro, A. (2024): Semi-automatic sentiment identification for Malay-English code-switched data. – Journal of Advanced Research Design 123(1): 198-212.
[20] Myers-Scotton, C. (1993): Social Motivations for Codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. – Clarendon Press, Oxford 177p.
[21] Obasi, J.C., Obasi, C.M. (2024): Communicative features of selected Nigerian ESL Generation Z’s language use on Twitter. – PHILOLOGIST: Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies 15(30): 130-162.
[22] Park, S., Park, J. (2021): The characteristics of Generation Z in the creator activities of Virgil Abloh. – Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles 45(2): 217-232.
[23] Pebriyanti, V., Rosyidah, R.H. (2026): Analysis of abbreviations used by Gen Z on Twitter (X): A qualitative study. – EJI: English Journal of Indragiri 10(1): 314-326.
[24] Poplack, S. (2013): “Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español”: Toward a typology of code-switching. – Linguistics 51(S1): 11-14.
[25] Prajarto, Y.A.N., Purwaningtyas, M.P.F. (2021): My personal showroom: Indonesian youths’ identity and space construction on Instagram. – SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, Special Issue 12p.
[26] Sabri, N.A., Hamdan, S., Nadarajan, N.T.M., Shing, S.R. (2020): The usage of English internet slang among Malaysians on social media. – Selangor Humaniora Review 4(1): 15-29.
[27] Suganya, P.R. (2025): Shaping language in the digital age: The impact of social media on modern linguistic practices. – SSRN Electronic Journal 8p.
[28] Tagg, C. (2015): Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. – Routledge, Abingdon 300p.
[29] Tahir, M., Suardi, Litta, L. (2025): Critical analysis of English language use in social media on discourse structure changes and linguistic identity of Generation Z. – International Journal for Science Review 2(10): 1-12.
[30] Tarihoran, N., Fachriyah, E., Tressyalina, Sumirat, I.R. (2022): The impact of social media on the use of code mixing by Generation Z. – International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 16(7): 54-69.
[31] Umurzakova, K. (2025): Linguistic variations in social media and the digital environment: A study on contemporary language practices. – TLEP: International Journal of Multidiscipline 2(2): 292-299.
[32] Wang, R. (2019): The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet [Book review]. – Social Semiotics 29(4): 557-559.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SITI AFIQAH MOHD SHAH, ERDA WATI BAKAR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
