FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING LEGAL DIMENSIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ROBOTICS APPLICATIONS: A FIQH PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • MOHAMED ASLAM AKBAR Department of Economics, International Islamic University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i1.597

Keywords:

Islamic jurisprudence, AI governance, ethical integrity, precaution

Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics has brought forth profound implications, particularly within the realm of ethics and jurisprudence. This paper seeks to initiate a humble yet significant exploration into the intersection of AI applications and Islamic jurisprudence. By focusing on foundational principles, the study highlights how Islamic legal frameworks can provide ethical guidance for human-AI interactions that ensure justice, social welfare, and moderation. A key focus of this work is the five indicators identified in Islamic jurisprudence that are particularly relevant for addressing AI abuses: (i) intent to harm, (ii) intention for an unlawful purpose, (iii) causing greater harm than good, (iv) unethical use resulting in damage to others, and (v) negligence or error in usage. These principles underscore the critical need for precaution and accountability in developing and deploying AI technologies. This paper also emphasizes the importance of preventing harmful applications of AI through the lens of Islamic technoethics. By offering this integrative perspective, the study hopes to contribute to ongoing discussions about AI governance and ethics, encouraging further research and dialogue. The intention is to provide a starting point for more inclusive and culturally informed frameworks that address the challenges and opportunities of technological advancements while upholding ethical integrity.

References

Akbar, M.A. (2022): Towards an Interpretation of Cryptocurrency as a Commodity from Maqasid al-Shari’ah Perspective. – International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research 5(2): 99-112.

Akbar, M.A., Ramlan, A.N.M., Pitchay, A.A., Annuar, H.A. (2025): Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Ecosystem: Balancing Innovation and Islamic Ethics for Sustainable Finance. – In Islamic Finance and Sustainability, Routledge 18p.

Alserhan, B.A. (2017): The principles of Islamic marketing. – Routledge 258p.

Arzroomchilar, E., Olamaiekopaie, M. (2022): Where technology meets Islam: towards an Islamic perspective on technology. – Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12(2): 14-27.

Ashrafian, H. (2015): Intelligent robots must uphold human rights. – Nature 519(7544): 391-391.

Bartneck, C., Keijsers, M. (2020): The morality of abusing a robot. – Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 11(1): 271-283.

Bennett, B., Daly, A. (2020): Recognising rights for robots: Can we? Will we? Should we? – Law, Innovation and Technology 12(1): 60-80.

Bertolini, A. (2013): Robots as products: the case for a realistic analysis of robotic applications and liability rules. – Law, Innovation and Technology 5(2): 214-247.

Blauth, T.F., Gstrein, O.J., Zwitter, A. (2022): Artificial intelligence crime: An overview of malicious use and abuse of AI. – IEEE Access 10: 77110-77122.

Brownsword, R. (2017): Law, liberty and technology, – The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology 17p.

Brščić, D., Kidokoro, H., Suehiro, Y., Kanda, T. (2015): Escaping from children's abuse of social robots. – In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 8p.

Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H. (2018): The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. – ArXiv Preprint 101p.

Carlini, N., Liu, C., Erlingsson, Ú., Kos, J., Song, D. (2019): The secret sharer: Evaluating and testing unintended memorization in neural networks. – In 28th USENIX security symposium (USENIX security 19) 17p.

Carlson, Z., Lemmon, L., Higgins, M., Frank, D., Salek Shahrezaie, R., Feil-Seifer, D. (2019): Perceived mistreatment and emotional capability following aggressive treatment of robots and computers. – International Journal of Social Robotics 11: 727-739.

Chaudhary, M.Y. (2020): Initial considerations for islamic digital ethics. – Philosophy & Technology 33(4): 639-657.

Danaher, J. (2020): Welcoming robots into the moral circle: a defence of ethical behaviourism. – Science and Engineering Ethics 26(4): 2023-2049.

Elmahjub, E. (2023): Artificial intelligence (AI) in Islamic ethics: Towards pluralist ethical benchmarking for AI. – Philosophy & Technology 36(4): 24p.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B. (2018): AI4People-an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. – Minds and Machines 28: 689-707.

Hassan, M.K., Lewis, M.K. (Eds.) (2007): Islamic finance. – Cheltenham, Glos, UK: Edward Elgar 460p.

Hibbard, B. (2014): Ethical artificial intelligence. – ArXiv Preprint 177p.

Hill, D.R. (1991): Mechanical engineering in the medieval near east. – Scientific American 264(5): 100-105.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C. (2019): Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning. – Center for Curriculum Redesign 242p.

Ikram, N.A.H.B.S., Kepli, M.Y.B.Z. (2018): Establishing legal rights and liabilities for artificial intelligence. – IIUMLJ 26(1): 161-181.

Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G.A. (Eds.) (2014): Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. – MIT Press 27p.

Malle, B.F. (2016): Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots. – Ethics and Information Technology 18: 243-256.

Martin, K. (2020): Flash crash-the trading savant who crashed the us stock market. – Financial Times 5p.

Masum, A.K.M., Ullah, M.C., Azad, M.A.K. (2012): Information technology (IT) ethics in the light of Islam. – IIUC Studies 9: 243-260.

Maududi, A. (1996): Ethical viewpoint of Islam. – Lahore: Islamic Publication 55p.

Moosa, E. (2016): Technology in Muslim moral philosophy. – Journal of Religion and Health 55(2): 369-383.

Müller, V.C., Bostrom, N. (2016): Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. – Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence 17p.

Nemitz, P. (2018): Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376(2133): 14p.

Pacey, A. (1993): Technology in world civilization: a thousand-year history. – Philosophy East and West 43(1): 250p.

Puzio, A. (2023): Robot, let us pray! Can and should robots have religious functions? An ethical exploration of religious robots. – AI & Society 17p.

Qadir, J., Suleman, M. (2018): Teaching ethics, (Islamic) values and technology: musings on course design and experience. – In 2018 7th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), IEEE 5p.

Ramadan, T. (2018): Islamic ethics: Sources, methodology and application. – Islamic Bioethics: Current Issues & Challenges 21p.

Richardson, K. (2016): The asymmetrical'relationship' parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. – Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 45(3): 290-293.

Robertson, J. (2014): Human rights vs. robot rights: Forecasts from Japan. – Critical Asian Studies 46(4): 571-598.

Salah, K., Rehman, M.H.U., Nizamuddin, N., Al-Fuqaha, A. (2018): Blockchain for AI: Review and open research challenges. – IEEE Access 4: 23p.

Scopino, G. (2020): Algo bots and the law: technology, automation, and the regulation of futures and other derivatives. – Cambridge University Press 250p.

Shinkafi, A.A., Yahaya, S., Sani, T.A. (2020): Realising financial inclusion in Islamic finance. – Journal of Islamic Marketing 11(1): 143-160.

Sparrow, R. (2017): Robots, rape, and representation. – International Journal of Social Robotics 9(4): 465-477.

Taddeo, M., Floridi, L. (2018): How AI can be a force for good. – Science 361(6404): 751-752.

Topol, E. (2019): Deep medicine: how artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. – Hachette UK 400p.

Whitby, B. (2008): Sometimes it’s hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents. – Interacting with Computers 20(3): 326-333.

Wibowo, A., Mansah, A. (2020): Analysis of SMEs in the ciputat traditional market in Islamic business ethics perspective. – In 6th Annual International Conference on Management Research (AICMaR 2019), Atlantis Press 5p.

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., Bogaardt, M.J. (2017): Big data in smart farming-a review. – Agricultural Systems 153: 69-80.

Zuboff, S. (2023): The age of surveillance capitalism. – In Social Theory Re-Wired, Routledge 10p.

Zuhayli, W., Gamal, M.A., Eissa, M.S. (2003): Financial transactions in Islamic jurisprudence. – Dar al-Fikr 352p.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

AKBAR, M. A. (2025). FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING LEGAL DIMENSIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ROBOTICS APPLICATIONS: A FIQH PERSPECTIVE. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i1.597

Issue

Section

Articles