NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS OF RADICAL THINKING IN GENERATION Z: A REVIEW ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i1.599Keywords:
radical thinking, Generation Z, polarisation, mental health, youth activismAbstract
Radical thinking within Generation Z demonstrates a unique combination of revolutionary beliefs and the ability to override systemic boundaries, largely shaped by the socio-political environment, as well as the wide-reaching power of the media. Nevertheless, the emergence of radical ideas among members of Generation Z poses an intriguing problem that requires particular attention due to the diverse negative consequences that it can pose on individual and social development. The objective of this study is to review the negative implications of radical thinking in Generation Z. In this study, a review analysis was used to evaluate the topic literature holistically. The steps of review analysis commenced with the definition of the scope of the research. The review analysis revealed several negative implications of radical thinking in Generation Z, including: (a) increased polarisation and conflict; (b) mental health strain; (c) disillusionment with traditional institutions; (d) risk of extremism; and (e) neglect of practical solutions. In conclusion, the construct of Generation Z being radical or innovative comes with a double-edged blade. On one hand, it decreases the chances of stagnation and social injustice, but on the other hand, it can lead to mental health issues, alienation from earthly institutions, extremism, and an over-divide in society. Further research needs to be done on the overarching impacts that radicality has on the mental state and social interaction of the Generation Z cohort, especially regarding their relations to formal institutions and civil society.
References
Ahuja, J., Fichadia, P.A. (2024): Concerns Regarding the Glorification of Mental Illness on Social Media. – Cureus 16(3): 3p
Akbar, B.M.B., Prawesti, D.R.D., Perbani, W.S.A. (2024): Big picture mental health of Generation Z in the world. – Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas Indonesia 4(1): 1-20.
Ameen, N., Hosany, S., Taheri, B. (2023): Generation Z's psychology and new‐age technologies: Implications for future research. – Psychology & Marketing 40(10): 2029-2040.
Ardi, A., Meilani, Y.F.C.P., Berlianto, M.P. (2024): Leader Readiness in Facing the Challenges of a VUCA Business Environment: Case Study of Generation Z. – European Business & Management 10(1): 10-15.
Atmaja, S., Khalid, I. (2023): Investigation of Optimal Pedagogical Approaches for Generation Z to Develop a High-Caliber Generation. – Enigma in Education 1(1): 21-25.
Cantrell, M. (2024): Recruiting and retaining generation z in the workforce. – Edis 3p.
Catapano, P., Cipolla, S., De Rosa, C., Milano, S., Vozza, D., Guadagno, D., Perris, F., Sampogna, G., Fiorillo, A. (2024): Is There a Relationship between Psychotic Disorders and the Radicalization Process? A Systematic Review. – Medicina 60(6): 16p.
Cerfolio, N., Glick, I., Kamis, D., Laurence, M. (2022): A retrospective observational study of psychosocial determinants and psychiatric diagnoses of mass shooters in the United States. – Psychodynamic Psychiatry 50(3): 1-16.
Dębski, M., Borkowska-Niszczota, M. (2020): Consumer ecological behaviour and attitudes towards pro-ecological activities in accommodation facilities by Generation Z. – Turyzm/Tourism 30(2): 43-50.
Deckman, M. (2024): The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy. – Columbia University Press 320p.
Dikeç, G., Öztürk, S., Taşbaşı, N., Figenergül, D., Güler, B.B. (2023): The Perceptions of Generation Z University Students about Their Futures: A Qualitative Study. – Sci 5(4): 16p.
Guntur, A., Rahmadanty, I.P., Ulfa, M. (2022): Mental health stigma among Generation Z students in Salafi Islamic Boarding Schools. – Journal of Health Sciences 15(03): 283-290.
Hamadeh, S.A. (2022): How gen Z can improve community literacy about the 17 SDGs? A realistic approach to construct a futuristic change-maker paradigm. – Green Technology, Resilience, and Sustainability 2(1): 11p.
Khairiyah, S.K., Safitri, F., Wulandari, M., Susanti, P.Z., Oktavia, S., Fikran, A.G. (2024): The role of guidance and counseling teachers in forming the mental helath of Generation Z. – BICC Proceedings 2: 97-102.
Liu, Z. (2024): Re-visiting the Discursive Power of China’s Generation Z: A Perspective on the Rise of New Populism in China Through Self-Media. – Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media 40: 1-6.
Nowacki, M., Kowalczyk-Anioł, J., Chawla, Y. (2023): Gen Z’s attitude towards green image destinations, green tourism and behavioural intention regarding green holiday destination choice: A study in Poland and India. – Sustainability 15(10): 17p.
Ozer, S., Obaidi, M., Pfattheicher, S. (2020): Group membership and radicalization: A cross-national investigation of collective self-esteem underlying extremism. – Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 23(8): 1230-1248.
Park, S.Y., Do, B., Yourell, J., Hermer, J., Huberty, J. (2024): Digital methods for the spiritual and mental health of Generation Z: Scoping Review. – Interactive Journal of Medical Research 13(1): 12p.
Putri, R.R., Undras, I., Marampa, E.R., Triyanto, Y. (2023): Peran Guru Pendidikan Agama Kristen dalam Menanamkan Sikap Inklusif Generasi Z. – Jurnal Teruna Bhakti 6(1): 111-120.
Răduț, F., Sicrea, C., Andrioni, F. (2023): The risks associated with the use of social media by Generation Z. – Technium Education and Humanities 6: 12-28.
Ramadhan, M.R., Basid, A., Faizin, N. (2023): Implementing Religious Moderation in Digital Space: Challenges and Opportunities Z Generation. – Aqlamuna: Journal of Educational Studies 1(1): 116-135.
Rice, L., Moffett, K. (2021): The political voices of generation Z. – Routledge 318p.
Ross, A. (2022): Young Europeans and their emerging ideas about political identities in an age of authoritarian dissent and fabricated news: what can we do to encourage their political understanding? – Improving the Quality of Childhood in Europe 21p.
Samha, A.C., Angelina, T., Ramadhona, Y., Sultari, M., Aziza, A., Hussuba, F., Putri, N.A., Munandar, H., Pasha, M.N., Anean, Z.P., Aini, N. (2022): Toxic Positivity Pada Generasi Z. – Proceeding Conference on Psychology and Behavioral Sciences 1(1): 90-94.
Saputra, E. (2019): Menelisik dinamika radikalisme Gen Z perempuan di Facebook. – Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 14(1): 103-125.
Savić, N., Lazarević, J., Grujić, F. (2023): Generation Z's letter to CEOs. – Ekonomika Preduzeća 71(1-2): 129-143.
Seibert, S.A. (2021): Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z's critical thinking and perseverance. – Teaching and Learning in Nursing 16(1): 85-88.
Septiawan, B., Masrunik, E. (2020): Motivation of generation z at work. – Jurnal Studi Manajemen dan Bisnis 7(2): 74-82.
Shanahan, L., Steinhoff, A., Bechtiger, L., Murray, A.L., Nivette, A., Hepp, U., Ribeaud, D., Eisner, M. (2022): Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study. – Psychological Medicine 52(5): 824-833.
Shin, H., Eastman, J., Li, Y. (2022): Is it love or just like? Generation Z’s brand relationship with luxury. – Journal of Product & Brand Management 31(3): 394-414.
Tomljenovic, H., Bubic, A., Erceg, N. (2022): Contribution of rationality to vaccine attitudes: Testing two hypotheses. – Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 35(2): 12p.
Vacchiano, M., Politi, E., Lueders, A. (2023): The COVID-19 pandemic as an existential threat: Evidence on young people’s psychological vulnerability using a Multifaceted Threat Scale. – Plos One 18(10): 12p.
Wilson, B. (2021): Generation Z: Born for the storm. – Simon and Schuster 192p.
Yap, S.F., Xu, Y., Tan, L. (2021): Coping with crisis: The paradox of technology and consumer vulnerability. – International Journal of Consumer Studies 45(6): 1239-1257.
Yulandari, A. (2023): Digital generation online shopping users: Not a secret for Generation Z. – Probisnis Jurnal Manajemen 14(6): 683-688.
Yunus, R. (2021): Increasing human literacy for Generation Z through learning to use technology in Indonesia. – International Journal of Science and Society 3(4): 245-256.
Zych, I., Nasaescu, E. (2022): Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family‐related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization. – Campbell Systematic Reviews 18(3): 68p.
