EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH PROBATION: LEGAL, ORGANISATIONAL AND STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES FROM MALAYSIA AND BEYOND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i2.625Keywords:
probation period, employee development, feedback mechanisms, skill enhancementAbstract
The probation period serves as a critical phase in employee development, providing a structured framework for assessing job suitability, fostering skill enhancement, and ensuring alignment between employees and organizational expectations. While not explicitly defined under Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955 or the Industrial Relations Act 1967, judicial precedents recognize probation as a trial period, necessitating fair and transparent employment policies. This study explores the significance of probationary periods in employee growth, particularly in skill acquisition, feedback mechanisms, and adaptation to organizational culture. Through comparative analysis, it examines global variations in probationary frameworks, highlighting the balance between employer discretion and employee rights in different jurisdictions. Despite its developmental benefits, probation presents challenges, including performance pressures, organizational cultural adaptation, information overload, and the risk of premature termination. Case studies from leading Malaysian corporations such as Maybank and Petronas illustrate best practices in probation management, including structured onboarding, mentorship programs, and continuous professional development initiatives. Furthermore, the legal and regulatory considerations of probationary employment underscore the need for equitable assessment frameworks, procedural fairness, and compliance with employment laws. By integrating global best practices with local employment standards, organizations can optimize probation management strategies to enhance employee engagement, retention, and long-term workforce sustainability. This study contributes to the broader discourse on human resource management by offering insights into the strategic utilization of probationary periods for both employee and organizational development.
References
Abraham, M., Kaliannan, M., Avvari, M.V., Thomas, S. (2023): Reframing talent acquisition, retention practices for organisational commitment in Malaysian SMEs: A managerial perspective. – Journal of General Management 13p.
Abusomwan, J.O. (2023): Termination of Contract of Employment during Probationary Period: Need for Judicial Review. – International Review of Law and Jurisprudence (IRLJ) 5(1): 27-32.
Carnegie, P. (2025): Probation fear in new starters: understanding and alleviating concerns. – Strategic HR Review 24(1): 17-22.
Cobb, L. (2024): The importance of employee probation periods. – BrightHR Web Portal 16p.
Dachner, A.M., Ellingson, J.E., Noe, R.A., Saxton, B.M. (2021): The future of employee development. – Human Resource Management Review 31(2): 14p.
Dehombreux, V. (2024): Formative Supervision’s Effects on Trusting Administrator-Teacher Relationships and Teachers’ Professional Growth. – Arizona State University 298p.
Fang, A. (2024): Probation and probationers in Malaysia. – Donovan & Ho Web Portal 5p.
Fridayani, J.A., Kusuma, S.E., Yuniarto, A.Y. (2022): Building Link-Match of Gen Z and The World Of Work Through Contextual-Adaptive Facilitation. – Jurnal Bisnis Strategi 31(2): 117-129.
Gathongo, J.K. (2020): Towards a fair hearing for all employees: a case of probationary employee's in kenya and the right to be heard prior to dismissal. – Obiter 41(3): 555-572.
George, M.R. (2023): A Critique on the Rights of Probationary Employees: A Comparative Analysis between Tanzania and Kenya Jurisdictions. – SSRN 94p.
Gordon, K., Auten, J., Gordon, D. (2022): Probationary Period: The Strategic Leader's Approach to Candidate Selection and Training. – In Handbook of Research on Educational Leadership and Research Methodology, IGI Global 15p.
Hadiyat, Y. (2023): High Performance Work Practice (HPWP) Implementation at Pt. Sumoda Tama Berkah (“Mbok Darmi Milk”) In Bogor City, West Java. – Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development 5(1): 57-65
Hutasoit, M.F. (2022): Human Resource Management of Pt. Nestle Indonesia Panjang Factory Lampung, Indonesia. – Economic Management and Social Sciences Journal 1(2): 36-44.
Intarakamhang, U., Pimthong, S. (2021): Evaluation of probationary performance of Thai Government officials. – International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 7(3): 287-300.
Jang, Y., Zhang, J., Zheng, D. (2024): Do entrepreneurs mistreat probationary employees? The mediating role of perceived ethical climate and moderating roles of core job characteristics. – Management Research Review 47(4): 581-601.
Johan, S., Ariawan, A. (2022): Correlation financial institutions, customers and employees per labour law. – Arena Hukum 15(1): 38-58.
Khor, A. (2024): Probation in Malaysia: What Employers Need to Know. – Synergy Outsourcing Web Portal 3p.
Lin, Y.E., Tseng, C.N., Wang, M.F., Wu, S.F.V., Jane, S.W., Chien, L.Y. (2020): Anxiety and work stress among newly employed nurses during the first year of a residency programme: A longitudinal study. – Journal of Nursing Management 28(7): 1598-1606.
Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Yang, Z., Gao, Z. (2025): The effect of abusive supervision on employee job performance: The moderating role of employment contract type. – Journal of Business Ethics 196(1): 209-221.
Narayanan, E., Ismail, L., Krishnasamy, P., Yusuf, A.H., Yusuf, A., Krishnan, I.A. (2022): Why do employers extend the probationary period of fresh graduates after employment feedback from the human resource managers. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 12(6): 585-598.
Nestle Professional Web Portal (2023): Managing staff: How to attract, manage and retain talent. – Nestle Professional Web Portal 7p.
Novia, A., Yuadi, I. (2023): Forecasting employee potential through probationary assessment. – JBMP (Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen Dan Perbankan) 9(2): 131-149.
O'Donnellan, R. (2024): Unpacking the challenges new hires face in 2024. – Intuition Web Portal 10p.
Othman, N., Mat, Z., Ismail, N. (2022): Factors Influencing Termination of Employment in Malaysian Private Sector: An Analysis from Industry. – Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications 71(3): 335-348.
Perera, S. (2021): Employment law: Probationary period. – SSRN Electronic 7p.
Petronas (2022): Board Onboarding and Professional Development Programme. – Petronas Integrated Report 2p.
Phillips, J. (2022): The impact of the pandemic on probation: lessons for the future. – Safer Communities 21(2): 112-122.
Saadin, I., Tambi, A.M., Karim, S.F., Salim, N.Z. (2018): The Association between work related stressor and work performance: A case Study among Executives of Group human Capital of Maybank Berhad. – International Journal of Academic Research In Business and Social Sciences 8(1): 497-505.
Smit, P., Grobler, J. (2021): Dismissal during Probationary Period of Employment in South Africa: An International Perspective. – African Journal of International and Comparative Law 29(4): 479-498.
Spira, J.B., Burke, C. (2009): Intel’s War on Information Overload: A Case Study. – New York, Basex 2p.
Stempkowski, M., Grafl, C. (2021): Probationary services in a pandemic. Results from an empirical study in Austria. – Probation Journal 68(4): 444-457.
Yella, G.V. (2020): The Used of Probationary Period in a Contract of Employment in Cameroon: A Legal Appraisal. – United International Journal for Research & Technology 1(9): 30-36.
Yik, C.S. (2022): Employment law: Probation. – Chia, Lee & Associate 5p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SIM JOJO, FADILLAH ISMAIL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
