BEYOND THE CODE: A REVIEW OF SOCIETAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN CONVERSATIONAL AI

Authors

  • ANUJA CHALKE Department of Marketing Strategy & Innovation, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • BOON LIAT CHENG Department of Marketing Strategy & Innovation, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • TECK HEANG LEE Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting, HELP University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • MELISSA TEOH TENG TENK Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting, HELP University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • HUI YAN YEONG Department of Marketing Strategy & Innovation, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i2.639

Keywords:

conversational AI, ChatGPT, ethics, societal implications, governance

Abstract

Conversational AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, are reshaping human-computer interaction by introducing more natural, intuitive, and personalized modes of communication. These systems hold transformative potential across diverse sectors, from education and healthcare to customer service, law and content creation. However, the rapid advancement of such technologies also raises critical ethical and societal concerns such that warrant deeper exploration. This paper delves into the evolving landscape of ChatGPT, discussing its origin and subsequent iterations, including the emergence of multimodal applications, the personalization of AI-human interactions, and the ethical challenges surrounding transparency, bias, and misinformation. While ChatGPT opens new avenues for interaction, it must operate within frameworks that ensure fairness, accountability, and trustworthiness. The responsible advancement of conversational AI requires both internal governance; through ethical design, robust training, and monitoring and external oversight, including regulatory policies and industry-wide standards. As these technologies become increasingly embedded in daily life, collaborative efforts among developers, regulators, and stakeholders are essential to promote responsible innovation. This paper argues for a balanced approach that nurtures innovation while addressing societal risks, advocating for standardized ethical principles and governance structures to guide the sustainable and equitable deployment of conversational AI.

References

Abadie, A., Chowdhury, S., Mangla, S.K. (2024): A shared journey: Experiential perspective and empirical evidence of virtual social robot ChatGPT's priori acceptance. – Technological Forecasting and Social Change 201: 23p.

Ajevski, M., Barker, K., Gilbert, A., Hardie, L., Ryan, F. (2023): ChatGPT and the future of legal education and practice. – The Law Teacher 57(3): 352-364.

Ali, S.R., Dobbs, T.D., Hutchings, H.A., Whitaker, I.S. (2023): Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters. – The Lancet Digital Health 5(4): e179-e181.

Annamalai, N., Ab Rashid, R., Hashmi, U.M., Mohamed, M., Alqaryouti, M.H., Sadeq, A.E. (2023): Using chatbots for English language learning in higher education. – Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 5: 9p.

Balagopalan, A., Madras, D., Yang, D.H., Hadfield-Menell, D., Hadfield, G.K., Ghassemi, M. (2023): Judging facts, judging norms: Training machine learning models to judge humans requires a modified approach to labeling data. – Science Advances 9(19): 14p.

Bazarkina, D., Pashentsev, E. (2020): Malicious use of artificial intelligence. – Russia in Global Affairs 18(4): 154-177.

Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.W., Zou, J.Y., Saligrama, V., Kalai, A.T. (2016): Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. – Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: 25p.

Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A. (2014): The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. – WW Norton & Company 86p.

Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J.S., Dwivedi, Y.K. (2021): Understanding managers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. – Technovation 106: 15p.

Cardon, P.W., Getchell, K., Carradini, S., Fleischmann, C., Stapp, J. (2023): Generative AI in the

Workplace: Employee Perspectives of ChatGPT Benefits and Organizational Policies. – SocArXiv Papers 17p.

Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., Bignami, E. (2023): Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. – Journal of Medical Systems 47(1): 5p.

Chan, G.K. (2024): AI employment decision-making: integrating the equal opportunity merit principle and explainable AI. – AI & SOCIETY 39(3): 1027-1038.

Chauhan, T., Palivela, H. (2021): Optimization and improvement of fake news detection using deep learning approaches for societal benefit. – International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 1(2): 11p.

Chen, H., Yuan, K., Huang, Y., Guo, L., Wang, Y., Chen, J. (2023): Feedback is all you need: from ChatGPT to autonomous driving. – Science China Information Sciences 66(6): 1-3.

Chen, R.J., Lu, M.Y., Chen, T.Y., Williamson, D.F., Mahmood, F. (2021): Synthetic data in machine learning for medicine and healthcare. – Nature Biomedical Engineering 5(6): 493-497.

Choi, J.H., Hickman, K.E., Monahan, A.B., Schwarcz, D. (2021): ChatGPT goes to law school. – Journal of Legl Education 71: 14p.

Curtis, N. (2023): To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT? The impact of artificial intelligence on academic publishing. – The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 42(4): 1p.

Davenport, T.H., Ronanki, R. (2018): Artificial intelligence for the real world. – Harvard Business Review 96(1): 108-116.

Du, H., Teng, S., Chen, H., Ma, J., Wang, X., Gou, C., Li, B., Ma, S., Miao, Q., Na, X., Ye, P. (2023): Chat with ChatGPT on intelligent vehicles: An IEEE TIV perspective. – IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 8(3): 2020-2026.

Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M. (2023): “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. – International Journal of Information Management 71: 63p.

Dwork, C., Roth, A. (2014): The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. – Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science 9(3-4): 211-407.

Firat, M. (2023): How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education? – Anadolu University 5p.

Flyverbom, M. (2016): Transparency: Mediation and the management of visibilities. – International Journal of Communication 10(1): 110-122.

Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., Chen, L. (2023): Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. – Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research 25(3): 277-304.

Gao, C.A., Howard, F.M., Markov, N.S., Dyer, E.C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., Pearson, A.T. (2022):

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. – BioRxiv 18p.

Gonzalez, W. (2023): How businesses can help reduce bias in AI. – Forbes Web Portal 9p.

Gunawan, J. (2023): Exploring the future of nursing: Insights from the ChatGPT model. – Belitung Nursing Journal 9(1): 1-5.

Hacker, P., Engel, A., Mauer, M. (2023): Regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models. – In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2p.

Hussain, K., Khan, M.L., Malik, A. (2024): Exploring audience engagement with ChatGPT-related content on YouTube: Implications for content creators and AI tool developers. – Digital Business 4(1): 14p.

Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., Azhar, K.A. (2022): Exploring teachers' attitudes towards using chatgpt. – Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences 3: 97-111.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E. (2019): The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. – Nature Machine Intelligence 1(9): 389-399.

Kroll, J. (2015): Accountable algorithms. – Princeton University 248p.

Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A., Uhl, M. (2023): The moral authority of ChatGPT. – ArXiv Preprint 20p.

Larivière, B., Bowen, D., Andreassen, T.W., Kunz, W., Sirianni, N.J., Voss, C., Wünderlich, N.V., De Keyser, A. (2017): “Service Encounter 2.0”: An investigation into the roles of technology, employees and customers. – Journal of Business Research 79: 238-246.

Martinez-Arellano, G., Cant, R., Woods, D. (2016): Creating AI characters for fighting games using genetic programming. – IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and Ai in Games 9(4): 423-434.

Nazir, A., Wang, Z. (2023): A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges. – Meta-Radiology 1(2): 12p.

Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., Iosifidis, V., Nejdl, W., Vidal, M. E., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Papadopoulos, S., Krasanakis, E. (2020): Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems-An introductory survey. – Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 10(3): 14p.

O’Brien, M. (2023): Chatbots sometimes make things up. Is AI’s hallucination problem fixable. – AP News 7p.

Orrù, G., Piarulli, A., Conversano, C., Gemignani, A. (2023): Human-like problem-solving abilities in large language models using ChatGPT. – Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6: 13p.

Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A. (2022): Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. – Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: 27730-27744.

Pavlik, J.V. (2023): Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. – Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 78(1): 84-93.

Rader, E., Cotter, K., Cho, J. (2018): Explanations as mechanisms for supporting algorithmic transparency. – In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 13p.

Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., Sutskever, I. (2018): Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. – OpenAI Web Portal 12p.

Ray, P.P. (2023): ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. – Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems 3: 121-154.

Sallam, M., Salim, N.A., Ala’a, B., Barakat, M., Fayyad, D., Hallit, S., Harapan, H., Hallit, R., Mahafzah, A., Ala'a, B., Fayyad Jr, D.J. (2023): ChatGPT output regarding compulsory vaccination and COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy: a descriptive study at the outset of a paradigm shift in online search for information. – Cureus 15(2): 16p.

Semmler, S., Rose, Z. (2017): Artificial intelligence: Application today and implications tomorrow. – Duke Law & Technology Review 16: 15p.

Shin, D. (2020): User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system: Perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. – Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 64(4): 541-565.

Siau, K., Wang, W. (2020): Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics: ethics of AI and ethical AI. – Journal of Database Management (JDM) 31(2): 74-87.

Susarla, A., Gopal, R., Thatcher, J.B., Sarker, S. (2023): The Janus effect of generative AI: Charting the path for responsible conduct of scholarly activities in information systems. – Information Systems Research 34(2): 399-408.

Taeihagh, A. (2021): Governance of artificial intelligence. – Policy and Society 40(2): 137-157.

Towers-Clark, C. (2020): Human skills will be most important in the digital future of work. – Forbes Magazine 5p.

Tudor Car, L., Dhinagaran, D.A., Kyaw, B.M., Kowatsch, T., Joty, S., Theng, Y.L., Atun, R. (2020): Conversational agents in health care: scoping review and conceptual analysis. – Journal of Medical Internet Research 22(8): 21p.

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., Polosukhin, I. (2017): Attention is all you need. – Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: 15p.

Wahid, R., Mero, J., Ritala, P. (2023): Written by ChatGPT, illustrated by Midjourney: generative AI for content marketing. – Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 35(8): 1813-1822.

Zarifhonarvar, A. (2024): Economics of chatgpt: A labor market view on the occupational impact of artificial intelligence. – Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics 3(2): 100-116.

Zheng, X., Zhang, C., Woodland, P.C. (2021): Adapting GPT, GPT-2 and BERT language models for speech recognition. – In 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), IEEE 7p.

Zhuo, T.Y., Huang, Y., Chen, C., Xing, Z. (2023): Exploring ai ethics of chatgpt: A diagnostic analysis. – ArXiv Preprint 10(4): 17p.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BEYOND THE CODE: A REVIEW OF SOCIETAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN CONVERSATIONAL AI. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 174-187. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i2.639