ENVIRONMENTAL VIRTUE ETHICS FOR THE ANTHROPOCENE IN BARBARA KINGSOLVER’S ANIMAL DREAMS

Authors

  • LAN XU Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • ZAINOR IZAT ZAINAL Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i5.829

Keywords:

anthropocene, Barbara Kingsolver, environmental ethics, environmental virtues, virtue ethics

Abstract

Human intervention on earth’s macrosystem has ushered in the age of the Anthropocene, prompting introspection among humans. This epoch demands a reawakening of human conscience and inner motivation to shape the trajectory of the Anthropocene. Environmental virtue ethics claims that the fundamental cause of environmental crisis lies in humans themselves. This study adopts a textual analysis approach to examine emotions and actions exhibited by Codi Noline, the protagonist in Barbara Kingsolver’s Animal Dreams. These traits are constitutive of making her environmentally virtuous, reflecting Kingsolver’s ethical contention as a Pulitzer Prize-winning author. This paper is informed by Ronald Sandler’s responsive virtues and productive virtues, which are, specifically, openness and courage. Additionally, originated by Aristotle, practical wisdom is employed to examine how courage better functions combined with practical wisdom. As a tentative practice in applying environmental virtue ethics to examine environmental virtues for the Anthropocene, this study reveals Kingsolver’s endeavor of setting environmental virtue exemplars from fictional characters to inspire humans’ long-term and stable contribution to a promising future.

Author Biography

  • ZAINOR IZAT ZAINAL, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

    Zainor Izat Zainal is a senior lecturer in the Department of English, Faculty of Modern Languages & Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, and holds the position of the Vice President of ASLE-ASEAN (Association for the Study of Literature and Environment- ASEAN)

References

[1] Angierski, K.N. (2020): Fictions of Empathy: Embodied Ethics in Contemporary Anthropocene Literature. – Cornell University, New York 192p.

[2] Aquilone, V.B. (2023): Refoliating the Anthropocene: Plant Being and Indigenous Ecological Knowledges in 20th and 21st Century Black Women’s Literature. – University of Delaware, Newark 409p.

[3] Aristotle, B. (1999): Nicomachean Ethics, (trans. Irwin,T.). – Hackett, Indianapolis 182p.

[4] Baysal, K. (Ed.) (2021): Apocalyptic visions in the Anthropocene and the rise of climate fiction. – Cambridge Scholars Publishing 280p.

[5] Bennett, J. (1974): The conscience of huckleberry Finn. – Philosophy 49(188): 123-134.

[6] Bharadwaj, A., Bhuyan, N. (2013): Understanding the Character of Santiago in The Old Man and The Sea within the Framework of Aristotelian Virtue Ethics and its Contemporary Relevance in Ethical Management. – Decision 40(3): 223-233.

[7] Boulding, L.A. (2018): Margaret Atwood: Speculative Fiction and Virtue Ethics University of Kent, England 382p.

[8] Bullard, R.D. (Ed.) (2005): The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. – San Francisco: Sierra Club Books 19: 32-33.

[9] Cafaro, P.J. (1997): Thoreau’s Vision of a Good Life in Nature: Towards an Environmental Virtue Ethics. – Boston University, Boston 511p.

[10] Callicott, J.B. (2018): Environmental Ethics in the Anthropocene. – Transtext(e)s Transcultures 20p.

[11] Crutzen, P.J. (2007): Geology of mankind: the anthropocene. – Ecologie & Politique 34(1): 141-148.

[12] Emsley, S. (2005): Jane Austen’s Philosophy of the Virtues. – Palgrave Macmillan, New York 202p.

[13] Ellis, E.C. (2018): Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction. – Oxford University Press, Oxford 183p.

[14] Frasz, G. (2016): Environmental Character: Environmental Feelings, Sentiments and Virtues. – Ethics in Progress 7(1): 32-43.

[15] Fredericks, R. (2014): Courage as an Environmental Virtue – Environmental Ethics 36(3): 339-355.

[16] Gross, C. (2023): Healing, resistance, transformation: Evolving Intimacies in the Age of Climate Change. – Iowa State University, Ames 95p.

[17] Hébert, L. (2022): Introduction to Literary Analysis. – Routledge, New York 254p.

[18] Jamieson, D. (2014): Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed-and What It Means for Our Future. – Oxford University Press, Oxford 266p.

[19] Kang, Y.K. (1996): Poststructuralist Environmentalism and Beyond: Ecoconsciousness in Snyder, Kingsolver, and Momaday. – Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 144p.

[20] Kingsolver, B. (1990): Animal Dreams. – Harper Collins e-books, New York 384p.

[21] Liu, T.Y. (2023): Wilderness Ethics in the Anthropocene. – Culture as Text 2(1): 105-118.

[22] Macduffie, A. (2018): Charles Darwin and the Victorian Pre-History of Climate Denial. – Victorian Studies 60(4): 543-564.

[23] McLaren, D.P. (2018): In a broken world: Towards an ethics of repair in the Anthropocene. – Anthropocene Review 5(2): 1-19.

[24] Painark, W. (2017): Healing Place and Self: The Renewed Ecological Perception and the Invisible Landscape in Barbara Kingsolver’s Animal Dreams. – Manusya: Journal of Humanities Regular 20(1): 69-92.

[25] Powell, K.I. (2023): Ecology and Retribution: Blake, Tokarczuk, and Animal Rights. – Brigham Young University, Provo 36p.

[26] Raffnsøe, S. (2016): Philosophy of the Anthropocene: The human turn. – Springer 75p.

[27] Rajalakshmi, E., Clement, S.K. (2023): Reconceiving Barbara Kingsolver’s Animal Dreams from an Ecocritical Perspective. – IIS University Journal of Arts 11(3): 208-218

[28] Sandler, R.L. (2009): Character and environment: A virtue-oriented approach to environmental ethics. – Columbia University Press 216p.

[29] Sandler, R.L. (2006): A Theory of Environmental Virtue. – Environmental Ethics 28(3): 247-264.

[30] Scarre, G. (2010): On Courage. – Routledge, New York 192p.

[31] Schwagerl, C. (2014): The Anthropocene: The human era and how it shapes our planet. – Synergetic Press 248p.

[32] Schwartz, B., Sharpe, K. (2010): Practical Wisdom: The Right Way to Do the Right Thing. – Riverhead Books the Penguin Group, New York 336p.

[33] Seel, M. (1996): Eine ästhetik der natur. – Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1231: 388p.

[34] Spampanato, P. (2023): The Unstoppable Anthropocene Engine: Animal Studies in Literature and the Lack of Individual Animal Study. – St. John’s university, New York 221p.

[35] Stackle, E. (2017): Jane Austen’s Aristotelian proposal: Sometimes falling in love is better than a beating. – Philosophy and Literature 41(1A): 195-212.

[36] Strickler, B. (2010): Hemmed In: Place, Disability, and Maternity in Animal Dreams and The Poisonwood Bible. – In: Leder, B. (ed.) Seeds of Change Critical Essays on Barbara Kingsolver, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville 19p.

[37] Stohr, K. (2006): Practical Wisdom and Moral Imagination in Sense and Sensibility. – Philosophy and Literature 30(2): 378-394.

[38] Swartz, P.C. (1993): Saving Grace: Political and Environmental Issues and the Role of Connections in Barbara Kingsolver’s Animal Dreams. – Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 1(1): 65-79.

[39] Tang, J.N. (2012): Memory Writing and Identity Construction in Animal Dreams. –Contemporary Foreign Literature 7p.

[40] Toner, C. (2017): Jane Austen on Practical Wisdom, Constancy, and Unreserve. – Philosophy and Literature 41(1A): 178-194.

[41] Wainwright, V. (2014): Jane Austen’s Challenges, or the Powers of Character and The Understanding. – Philosophy and Literature 38(1): 58-73.

[42] Zhu, Y.J. (2021): The Construction of Homer's Identity in Animal Dreams from the Perspective of Trauma. – Literary Criticism 3p.

[43] Zylinska, J. (2014): Minimal ethics for the Anthropocene. – Open Humanities Press 157p.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ENVIRONMENTAL VIRTUE ETHICS FOR THE ANTHROPOCENE IN BARBARA KINGSOLVER’S ANIMAL DREAMS. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(5), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i5.829