KEY ATTRIBUTED OF BEST PRACTICES IN EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FROM MALAYSIAN LISTED COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i6.884Keywords:
best practices, executive, transparency, governance, ethicalAbstract
This study investigates the implementation of best practices in executive compensation among Malaysian publicly listed companies, focusing on their compliance with the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2021. Utilizing a sample of 26 firms and 222 directorship profiles, the research evaluates the extent to which remuneration policies align with performance metrics, transparency standards and ethical governance practices in financial year ended 2024. The findings reveal full compliance with MCCG Practice 8.1, indicating a widespread commitment to baseline transparency. However, adoption rates for Practices 8.2 and 8.3 are critically low, suggesting a lack of depth in governance maturity. A significant correlation was found between firms that adopt gender diversity and professional development for directors and improved adherence to remuneration related governance practices. Therefore, the study contributes to the discourse on ethical leadership in emerging markets, offering practical insights for policymakers, regulators and boards aiming to promote equitable, performance-aligned executive compensation. A key limitation is the small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should expand the dataset and include qualitative insights.
References
[1] Aguilera, R.V., Federo, R., Justo, R., Merida, A.L., Pascual‐Fuster, B. (2025): The Corporate Governance of Business Groups Around the World: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. – Corporate Governance: An International Review 33(2): 298-325.
[2] Alharbi, B., Alharbi, A. (2021): Corporate governance development and practices in an emerging economy: a review of empirical findings and literature in Saudi Arabia. – International Journal of Business and Management 16(3): 11-21.
[3] Bebchuk, L.A., Fried, J.M. (2006): Pay without performance: Overview of the issues. – Academy of Management Perspectives 20(1): 5-24.
[4] Bursa Malaysia (2022): Bursa Malaysia Company Announcements. – Bursa Malaysia Web Portal 2p.
[5] Chin, A., Lye, O.C., Najaf, K. (2024): The corporate risk-taking and performance of politically connected firms: evidence from Malaysia. – Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 16(2): 367-391.
[6] Ejiogu, C., Ogamba, I. (2021): Executive compensation: transparency, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility perspectives. – In Financial and Managerial Aspects in Human Resource Management: A Practical Guide 11p.
[7] Ellili, N.O.D. (2022): Impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on dividend policy: What is the role of corporate governance? Evidence from an emerging market. – Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29(5): 1396-1413.
[8] Haw, T.J., Kueh, J., Ling, S.W.S. (2020): Corruption and growth in ASEAN countries: A non-linear investigation. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10(3): 347-369.
[9] Khatib, S.F., Al Amosh, H., Ananzeh, H. (2023): Board compensation in financial sectors: A systematic review of twenty-four years of research. – International Journal of Financial Studies 11(3): 22p.
[10] Meng, T., Lu, D., Yu, D., Yahya, M.H., Zariyawati, M.A. (2024): Is executive compensation aligned with the company’s ESG objectives? Evidence from Chinese listed companies based on the PSM-DID approach. – Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1): 1-15.
[11] Ning, Y., Hu, B., Xu, Z. (2024): CEO pay-performance sensitivity and pay for luck and asymmetry. – Managerial Finance 50(11): 1954-1970.
[12] Sajnóg, A., Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A. (2022): Executive compensation and the financial performance of Polish listed companies from the corporate governance perspective. Equilibrium. – Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 17(2): 459-480.
[13] Securities Commission Malaysia (2021): Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance. – Securities Commission of Malaysia Web Portal 2p.
[14] Syed Anuar, S.A., Hamzah, N., Rahmat, M.M. (2023): Government Board of Director: The Influence of Director Identifications on Human Capital Acquisition and Board Oversight Roles. – Jurnal Pengurusan 68(9): 1-14.
[15] Tian, Y., Hou, A., Hu, C.C., Chai, L. (2025): Policy-driven ESG mandates for immediate financial performance and long-term Innovation: Synergistic insights from Chinese enterprises. – Journal of Cleaner Production 520: 13p.
[16] Wang, Y., Wang, F., Liu, S. (2021): The influence of executive compensation gap on earnings management from the perspective of media supervision: Evidence from China. – Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 10p.
[17] Zhu, C., Liu, X., Chen, D., Yue, Y. (2024): Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings. – Heliyon 10(12): 1-17.
[18] Zulkifli, N.S., Shukor, Z.A., Rahman, M.R.C.A. (2017): Intellectual capital efficiency and firm performance in malaysia: The effect of government ownership. – Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 8: 93-105.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 INTAN NUR NATASYA AHMAD RIZAUDIN, MOHD SHAZWAN MOHD ARIFFIN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.