INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES AND SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: GREEN LOGISTICS MEDIATION AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT MODERATION EFFECTS

Authors

  • OMRAN KHAMIS AL-HADIDI Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NOOR AKMA MOHD SALLEH Faculty of Business and Accountancy, Universiti Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i6.963

Keywords:

industry 4.0 technologies, Green Logistics Practices (GLP), sustainability performance, government support, Resource-Based View (RBV), institutional theory

Abstract

This conceptual paper investigates the relationship between Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies, Green Logistics Practices (GLP), and sustainability performance, with government support as a moderating factor. In response to escalating sustainability challenges and the accelerated pace of digital transformation, the study addresses a key gap in understanding how the adoption of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) translates into sustainability outcomes. While prior work has considered the benefits of digitalization, the mediating role of GLP and the influence of institutional support have received limited scholarly attention. Drawing on a comprehensive review of recent literature (2020–2024), the paper proposes a conceptual framework grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Institutional Theory. RBV conceptualizes I4.0 as strategic resources and GLP as organizational capabilities, whereas Institutional Theory highlights how government policies shape adoption. The study advances theory by integrating internal and external perspectives to clarify the technology–sustainability nexus, and offers practical insights for firms aligning digital transformation with sustainability goals and for policymakers promoting green logistics.

References

[1] Ahmad, A., Ikram, A., Rehan, M., Ahmad, A. (2022): Going green: Impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. – Frontiers in Psychology 13: 12p.

[2] Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Acquah, I., Dacosta, E., Baah, C., Ahenkorah, E. (2020): The role of green logistics management practices, supply chain traceability and logistics ecocentricity in sustainability performance. – The International Journal of Logistics Management 32(2): 538-566.

[3] Alraja, M., Imran, R., Khashab, B., Shah, M. (2022): Technological innovation, sustainable green practices and SMEs sustainable performance in times of crisis. – Information Systems Frontiers 24(4): 1081-1105.

[4] Anwar, M., Tajeddini, K., Ullah, R. (2020): Entrepreneurial finance and new venture success: The moderating role of government support. – Business Strategy and Development 3(4): 408-421.

[5] Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., Nuertey, D., Kumi, C., Akyeh, J., Fiadjoe, P. (2023): Achieving green firm reputation through green customer salience and reverse logistics practices. – International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 73(3): 837-854.

[6] Barbosa, M. (2024): Government support mechanisms for sustainable agriculture: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. – Sustainability 16(5): 17p.

[7] Cuevas-Pichardo, L., Guzmán, G., Gómez-Guillamón, A., Garza-Reyes, J. (2024): The mediating role of circular economy in the relationship between industry 4.0 and sustainable performance in the manufacturing industry. – Business Strategy and the Environment 34(2): 1735-1750.

[8] Endang, M.W., Rahayu, S.M., Nurtjahjono, G.E., Rokhimakhumullah, D.N.F. (2022): The effect of multi-channel marketing strategy and market logistics toward the improvement of MSMEs’ sales during COVID-19 pandemic. – Journal of Public Administration Studies 7(2): 13-18.

[9] Farradia, Y., Bon, A., Muharam, H. (2021): The role of external green supply chain management on green marketing mix toward sustainability of petrochemical industry in Indonesia. – EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web 8(36): 6p.

[10] Guo, X., Xiang, L. (2023): Research on the development strategy of e-business green logistics based on AHP. – E3S Web of Conferences 372: 6p.

[11] Gupta, A., Singh, R. (2020): Managing operations by a logistics company for sustainable service quality: Indian perspective. – Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 31(5): 1309-1327.

[12] Habib, M., Bao, Y., Nabi, N., Dulal, M., Asha, A., Islam, M. (2021): Impact of strategic orientations on the implementation of green supply chain management practices and sustainable firm performance. – Sustainability 13(1): 21p.

[13] Hajiheydari, N., Shouraki, M., Vares, H., Mohammadian, A. (2022): Digital sustainable business model innovation: Applying dynamic capabilities approach. – Foresight 25(3): 420-447.

[14] He, C., Xu, X. (2024): Research on green development decision making of logistics enterprises based on three-party game. – Sustainability 16(7): 14p.

[15] Ismayil, N., Karagulle, O. (2023): The effect of digitalization process and green logistics applications on logistics performance: Measuring Azerbaijan logistics companies. – Preprints 11p.

[16] Issa, A., Khadem, A., Alzubi, A., Berberoğlu, A. (2024): The path from green innovation to supply chain resilience: Do structural and dynamic supply chain complexity matter? – Sustainability 16(9): 33p.

[17] Iwan, S., Wagner, N., Kijewska, K., Jensen, S. (2024): Concept of the knowledge-based city logistics: Problems and solutions. – PLOS ONE 19(6): 24p.

[18] Jayarathna, C., Agdas, D., Dawes, L. (2022): Exploring sustainable logistics practices toward a circular economy: A value creation perspective. – Business Strategy and the Environment 32(1): 704-720.

[19] Jedynak, M., Czakon, W., Kuźniarska, A., Mania, K. (2021): Digital transformation of organizations: What do we know and where to go next? – Journal of Organizational Change Management 34(3): 629-652.

[20] Joensuu-Salo, S., Matalamäki, M. (2023): The impact of digital capability on firm performance and growth in incumbent SMEs. – Journal of Enterprising Culture 31(2): 211-232.

[21] Karia, N. (2022): Antecedents and consequences of environmental capability towards sustainability and competitiveness. – Sustainability 14(19): 16p.

[22] Kim, D., Na, J., Ha, H. (2024): Exploring the impact of green logistics practices and relevant government policy on the financial efficiency of logistics companies. – Heliyon 10(10): 9p.

[23] Kolev, D., Otsetova, A. (2022): The impact of ERP systems on logistics (the case study of logistics services sector in the Republic of Bulgaria). – International Journal of Business 27(1): 1-15.

[24] Korucuk, S., Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Karamaşa, Ç., Zavadskas, E. (2022): Assessing green approaches and digital marketing strategies for twin transition via Fermatean fuzzy SWARA-COPRAS. – Axioms 11(12): 25p.

[25] Labaran, M., Masood, T. (2023): Industry 4.0 driven green supply chain management in renewable energy sector: A critical systematic literature review. – Energies 16(19): 25p.

[26] Letunovska, N., Offei, F., Junior, P., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Kwiliński, A. (2023): Green supply chain management: The effect of procurement sustainability on reverse logistics. – Logistics 7(3): 17p.

[27] Li, W., Xiao, X., Yang, X., Li, L. (2023): How does digital transformation impact green supply chain development? An empirical analysis based on the TOE theoretical framework. – Systems 11(8): 21p.

[28] Ma, L., Zhang, X., Dong, L. (2023): Enhancing sustainable performance: The innovative strategy of digital transformation leading green collaborative management. – Sustainability 15(17): 28p.

[29] Martins, A. (2022): Dynamic capabilities and SME performance in the COVID-19 era: The moderating effect of digitalization. – Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 15(2): 188-202.

[30] Miao, Z., Zhao, G. (2023): Configurational paths to the green transformation of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: A TOE framework based on fsQCA and NCA approaches. – Scientific Reports 13(1): 15p.

[31] Mohsen, B. (2022): Principles of sustainable logistics. – IntechOpen 27p.

[32] Morella, P., Lamban, M.P., Royo, J., Sanchez, J.C., Latapia, J. (2023): Technologies associated with Industry 4.0 in green supply chains: A systematic literature review. – Sustainability 15(12): 24p.

[33] Moroza, N., Jurgelāne-Kaldava, I. (2020): Theoretical analysis of factors affecting the development of logistics centre. – Economic Science for Rural Development 53: 208-214.

[34] Nagy, G., Tóth, Á., Illés, B., Varga, A. (2023): The impact of increasing digitization on the logistics sector and logistics service providers. – Multidiszciplináris Tudományok 13(4): 19-29.

[35] Ngisau, N., Ibrahim, N. (2020): Technological innovation adoption in manufacturing sector: The moderator role of government support. – Journal of Economics Business and Management 8(3): 200-205.

[36] Nureen, N., Liu, D., Ahmad, B., Irfan, M. (2022): Exploring the technical and behavioral dimensions of green supply chain management: A roadmap toward environmental sustainability. – Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(42): 63444-63457.

[37] Okorokov, R., Timofeeva, A., Filyanina, E., Benchabane, M. (2021): Institutional approach to classification of sustainable digital technologies in service logistics. – E3S Web of Conferences 258: 9p.

[38] Olanipekun, A., Sutrisna, M. (2021): Facilitating digital transformation in construction: A systematic review of the current state of the art. – Frontiers in Built Environment 7: 21p.

[39] Omotayo, A., Melan, M. (2022): Innovative logistics practices: Performance assessment of third-party logistics services providers in Malaysia. – Journal of Economics Management and Trade 10p.

[40] Otache, I., Usang, O. (2021): Innovation capability and SME performance in times of economic crisis: Does government support moderate? – African Journal of Economic and Management Studies 13(1): 76-88.

[41] Savina, H., Dusheiko, Y., Rozova, A. (2021): The essence of the logistics activities of the enterprise in modern business conditions. – VUZF Review 6(3): 154-166.

[42] Shabur, M. (2024): A comprehensive review on the impact of Industry 4.0 on the development of a sustainable environment. – Discover Sustainability 5(1): 25p.

[43] Shahzad, M., Liu, H., Zahid, H. (2024): Industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable performance: Do green supply chain collaboration, circular economy practices, technological readiness and environmental dynamism matter? – Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 36(1): 1-22.

[44] Sharma, M., Luthra, S., Joshi, S., Kumar, A., Jain, A. (2022): Green logistics driven circular practices adoption in industry 4.0 era: A moderating effect of institutional pressure and supply chain flexibility. – Journal of Cleaner Production 383: 12p.

[45] Singh, J., Singh, H., Kumar, A. (2020): Impact of lean practices on organizational sustainability through green supply chain management: An empirical investigation. – International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 11(6): 1035-1068.

[46] Smith, D., Attwell, K., Evers, U. (2021): Support for a COVID-19 vaccine mandate in the face of safety concerns and political affiliations: An Australian study. – Politics 42(4): 480-491.

[47] Srivastava, D., Kumar, V., Ekren, B., Upadhyay, A., Tyagi, M., Kumari, A. (2022): Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors. – Technological Forecasting and Social Change 176: 26p.

[48] Sun, X., Yu, H., Solvang, W., Wang, Y., Wang, K. (2021): The application of Industry 4.0 technologies in sustainable logistics: A systematic literature review to explore future research opportunities. – Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29(7): 9560-9591.

[49] Tan, B., Wang, F., Liu, J., Kang, K., Costa, F. (2020): A blockchain-based framework for green logistics in supply chains. – Sustainability 12(11): 13p.

[50] Thai, H., Hue, T., Tran, M. (2024): Dynamic capabilities and digitalization as antecedents of innovation and sustainable performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese SMEs. – Journal of Asia Business Studies 18(2): 385-411.

[51] Umar, M., Khan, S., Yusliza, M., Ali, S., Yu, Z. (2021): Industry 4.0 and green supply chain practices: An empirical study. – International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 71(3): 814-832.

[52] Uwamahoro, A., Nadeem, S., Shale, N., Wachiuri, E. (2023): Green logistics practices in the supply chain and operational performance. – Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 8(3): 263-272.

[53] Van, H., Nguyen, N. (2023): Greening the Vietnamese supply chain: The influence of green logistics knowledge and intellectual capital. – Heliyon 9(5): 15p.

[54] Wahid, A., Hermansyah, M., Firdausi, M. (2023): Classification of receipt of BPNT social assistance using the C4.5 algorithm. – PRMANDALA 4: 828-833.

[55] Wahyuni, S., Taufik, A., Hui, F. (2020): Exploring key variables of port competitiveness: Evidence from Indonesian ports. – Competitiveness Review 30(5): 529-553.

[56] Yue, L., Ye, M., Chen, Q. (2022): The impact of partnerships and information sharing on corporate sustainable performance: A mediation model moderated by government support. – Frontiers in Psychology 13: 11p.

[57] Zhang, W., Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Li, W. (2020): How to coordinate economic, logistics and ecological environment? Evidences from 30 provinces and cities in China. – Sustainability 12(3): 23p.

[58] Zhu, Y., Hui-fang, Z., Siddik, A., Zheng, Y., Sobhani, F. (2023): Understanding corporate green competitive advantage through green technology adoption and green dynamic capabilities. – Systems 11(9): 21p.

[59] Zuhri, M., Abanan, R., Susilowati, C. (2024): The influence of green logistics management on financial outcomes with market performance as an intermediary. – International Journal of Finance and Management Research 6(3): 11p.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES AND SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: GREEN LOGISTICS MEDIATION AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT MODERATION EFFECTS. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(6), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i6.963