FRONTIER OF AMBIGUITY: EXPLORING IDENTITY AND RECOGNITION AMONG HOKLO SETTLERS IN QING TAIWAN

Authors

  • YU SHEN FANG Economics and Management College, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing City, China.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.967

Keywords:

marginalization, minnan immigrants, Qing Taiwan, uncertainty, identity

Abstract

This study adopts "marginalization" as a theoretical perspective to explore the historical circumstances and social behavior of Minnan (Hoklo or Southern Fujian) immigrants in Taiwan during the Qing Dynasty. The research context lies in the Qing court's passive governance of Taiwan under the principle of "administering Taiwan to guard against Taiwan," which led to an "institutional vacuum" and "fragmentation of authority," trapping immigrants in a state of "dual alienation" regarding their identity. The research motivation stems from the fact that existing studies have failed to effectively link macro-structural factors with micro-psychological aspects while lacking a systematic explanation of the logic behind marginalized experiences. To address this, this study aims to reconstruct the generative logic of Minnan immigrants’ identity formation and social behavior, incorporating theories of "uncertainty" and anxiety to deepen the analysis. The research methodology employs a qualitative approach that combines historical document analysis with theoretical construction, establishing an analytical framework of "structure–psychology–action" and examining case studies such as the Zhu Yigui and Lin Shuangwen uprisings. The findings reveal that the marginalized situation in Qing-era Taiwan resulted from the mutual reinforcement of institutional exclusion and social contradictions. The behavior of Minnan immigrants exhibited a progressive spectrum from "passive adaptation" to "passive resistance" and ultimately to "active rebellion." Their uprisings represented extreme attempts by marginalized groups to break through “passive uncertainty” in their quest for recognition and dignity.

References

[1] Bauman, Z. (2006): Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. – Polity Press 128p.

[2] Bhabha, H.K. (1994): The location of culture. – Routledge 440p.

[3] Bourdieu, P. (2013): Outline of a theory of practice. Nice R, trans. – Cambridge University Press 248p.

[4] Chen, K.L. (1990): Qingdai Taiwan yimin shehui yanjiu [清代臺灣移民社會研究]. – Xiamen University Press 300p.

[5] Chen, Q.N. (1994): Taiwan de chuan tong Zhongguo she hui [臺灣的傳統中國社會]. – Taipei: Yunchen Publishing 295p.

[6] Fang, Y.S. (2025): Social Dynamics and Marginalized Perspectives During Qing Governance in Taiwan. – Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 6(4): 43-55.

[7] Giddens, A. (1984): The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. – University of California Press 16p.

[8] Gilroy, P. (1993): The black altantic: Modernity and double consciousness. – Harvard University Press 137p.

[9] Hall, S. (1990): Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. – London: Lawrence & Wishart 6p.

[10] Hoffer, E. (2002): The true believer: Thoughts on the nature of mass Movements. – Harper Perennial Modern Classics 192p.

[11] Hsu, H.C. (1993): Qingdai Taiwan de lüying [清代臺灣的綠營]. – Taipei: Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica 496p.

[12] Kerckhoff, A.C., McCormick, T.C. (1955): Marginal status and marginal personality. – Social Forces 34(1): 48-55.

[13] Lee, E.S. (1966): A theory of migration. – Demography 3(1): 47-57.

[14] Mann, J.W. (1958): Group relations and the marginal personality. – Human Relations 11(1): 77-92.

[15] May, R. (2015): The meaning of anxiety. – W. W. Norton & Company 408p.

[16] Nakamura, T. (2002): Studies in Taiwanese history under Dutch rule: Volume 2 [荷蘭時代臺灣史研究下卷]. – Taipei: Daoxiang Publishing 638p.

[17] Park, R.E. (1928): Human migrations and the marginal man. – American Journal of Sociology 33(6): 881-893.

[18] Said, E.W. (1978): Orientalism. – New York: Pantheon Books, Vintage 378p.

[19] Scott, J.C. (1985): Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. – Yale University Press 422p.

[20] Shepherd, J.R. (1993): Statecraft and political economy on the Taiwan frontier, 1600-1800. – Stanford University Press 616p.

[21] Shih, T.F. (2001): The Spatial structure and the developmental Mechanism of Taiwan’s Territorial society during the Japanese era: Case of Ming-hsiung. – Taiwan Historical Research 8(1): 1-39.

[22] Stonequist, E.V. (1937): The marginal man: A study in personality and culture conflict. – New York, Chicago C. Scribner's Sons 228p.

[23] Tong, J. (1992): Disorder Under Heaven: Collective Violence in the Ming Dynasty. – Stanford University Press 325p.

[24] Wang, F.C. (2003): The imagined communities: Ethnicity in contemporary Taiwanese society [當代臺灣社會的族群想像]. – Taipei: Qunxue Publishing 195p.

[25] Wang, S. (1994): Social and economic history of Taiwan in the Qing dynasty [清代臺灣社會經濟]. – Taipei: Lianjing Publishing 588p.

[26] Zhao, Z. (2015): Qing tongzhi shiqi de Taiwan minbian yu xiedou [清統治時期的臺灣民變與械鬥]. – Focus News Web Portal 10p..

[27] Zheng, S.L. (2016): Qingchu Zhangzhou ren lai Tai tukan shidai beijing zhi yanjiu [清初漳州人來臺拓墾時代背景之研究]. – Tunghai University Library Journal 8: 31-49.

[28] Zheng, Z. (2024): Xiangzu yu guojia: Duoyuan shiye zhong Min Tai chuantong shehui (Xiuding ben) [鄉族與國家:多元視野中的閩台傳統社會(Revised ed.)]. – SDX Joint Publishing Company 7p.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FRONTIER OF AMBIGUITY: EXPLORING IDENTITY AND RECOGNITION AMONG HOKLO SETTLERS IN QING TAIWAN. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i1.967