GENDERED PERSUASION IN PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS: ARISTOTELIAN ANALYSIS OF ETHOS, PATHOS, LOGOS IN HARRIS-TRUMP RHETORIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i6.969Keywords:
Aristotle, persuasion, gendered rhetoric, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, political communicationAbstract
The 2024 United States presidential campaign offered a unique opportunity to examine the intersection of gender and political communication, particularly through the persuasive linguistic strategies of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. Although extensive scholarship exists on gender bias in political leadership, fewer studies have analyzed how gender expectations shape candidates’ deployment of classical rhetorical appeals. Guided primarily by Aristotle’s concepts of ethos, pathos, and logos, and supported interpretively by Lakoff’s gender and language theory and Role Congruity Theory, this manuscript explores the ways in which Harris and Trump construct credibility, evoke emotional responses, and develop logical arguments in their campaign speeches. The analysis draws on six speeches delivered across three key campaign stages, representing primary election statements, pre-election arguments, and post-election remarks. Speech texts were assembled into a cleaned corpus and coded through NVivo, supported by type-token ratio calculations to capture lexical diversity. Findings show that Harris constructs an ethos rooted in moral legitimacy, service, and collective identity, deploys empathetic and inclusive emotional appeals, and relies on structured, policy-oriented logical reasoning. Trump constructs a contrasting ethos of authoritative dominance, uses fear, anger, and crisis-driven emotional activation, and employs simplified causality to justify assertive political action. The comparative analysis reveals that Aristotelian appeals are deeply shaped by gender norms, with Harris navigating contradictory expectations of authority and warmth, and Trump amplifying traditionally masculine rhetorical conventions without penalty. By demonstrating how persuasive appeals intersect with gendered communicative structures, this manuscript contributes to scholarship in political rhetoric and gender studies, offering insights relevant for understanding contemporary presidential discourse and the challenges faced by female candidates in navigating expectations of leadership, emotion, and public credibility.
References
[1] Bligh, M.C., Kohles, J.C., Meindl, J.R. (2004): Charting the language of leadership: A methodological investigation of President Bush and the crisis of 9/11. – Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3): 562-574.
[2] Eagly, A.H. (2007): Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. – Psychology of Women Quarterly 31(1): 1-12.
[3] Heilman, M.E., Wallen, A.S., Fuchs, D., Tamkins, M.M. (2004): Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. – Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3): 416-427.
[4] Kamaruzaman, N.A. (2024): Negotiating non-normative identities: Gender nonconforming Malaysian Muslims on Instagram. – The Journal of Men’s Studies 32(2): 276-299.
[5] Kazemian, B., Hashemi, S. (2014): Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s 2012 speeches: Views from systemic functional linguistics and rhetoric. – Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4(6): 1178-1187.
[6] Koenig, A.M., Eagly, A.H., Mitchell, A.A., Ristikari, T. (2011): Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. – Psychological Bulletin 137(4): 616-642.
[7] Lakoff, R. (1973): Language and woman’s place. – Language in Society 2(1): 45-79.
[8] O’Barr, W.M., Atkins, B.K. (2005): “Women’s language” or “powerless language”? – In: Joseph, J., Taylor, T. (Eds.) Language and Communication, Routledge 14p.
[9] Osborne, L.L. (1980): Rhetorical patterns in President Kennedy’s major speeches: A case study. – Presidential Studies Quarterly 10(3): 332-335.
[10] Pew Research Center. (2024): In tied presidential race, Harris and Trump have contrasting strengths, weaknesses. – Pew Research Center 6p.
[11] Rohrbach, T. (2025): Are women politicians kind and competent? Disentangling stereotype incongruity in candidate evaluations. – Political Behavior 47: 411-434.
[12] Stanaland, A., Gaither, S., Gassman-Pines, A. (2023): When is masculinity “fragile”? An expectancy–discrepancy–threat model of masculine identity. – Personality and Social Psychology Review 27(4): 359-377.
[13] Tian, H.M. (2022): The application of neo-Aristotelian rhetoric to political speeches: A case study of the inaugural speeches of UK Prime Ministers Truss and Sunak. – Modern Linguistics 10(12): 3016-3022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 NUR ATIRAH KAMARUZAMAN, SHIKE SONG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
